Bulldog Force
Referee
- Messages
- 20,619
How awesome was Iniesta's ball to Pedro? That sank the ship for Real.
Should Mourinho be given the boot?
I mean he came in, had a star studded squad at his disposal, added big names including Ozil, Khadira, Di Maria, and Cavalho and achieved nothing more than a Copa Del Rey victory whilst residing over Real's most embarrassing ever loss in a Clasico.
Cappello won the league a few years ago and was given the boot, and he never parked the bus as badly as Jose in the Clasico matches
For me this partly was a contributing factor in his amazing outburts after the 0-2 loss in the first leg. With La Liga all but Barca's, the CL was his main hope.
He has to be under some pressure. By Real's standards, he's failed miserably. I think he's safe though. He seems to have more sway there than the managers that preceded him.
At FC Franco 2 things are expected if a manager, to win trophies, and to win playing attractive football, the not so special one has failed on both accounts, if his name wasn't Jose Mourinho I've got no doubt he'd be given the sack
Ronaldo didn't foul him though. Ronaldo was fouled and as he hit the ground he made some contact with Mascherano. It was a direct result of a foul on Ronaldo, so it's play on in my eyes. Anywhere else on the field and there's not a chance that would be called back for a foul.Had to lol at David Zdrilic's interpretation of the advantage rule (when he was claiming that the Higuain's goal should have stood). I've never heard of a situation where the team with advantage being played was then allowed to have a subsequent foul (that they comitted) go unpenalised because they had advantage.
Ronaldo didn't foul him though. Ronaldo was fouled and as he hit the ground he made some contact with Mascherano. It was a direct result of a foul on Ronaldo, so it's play on in my eyes. Anywhere else on the field and there's not a chance that would be called back for a foul.
Also, Mascherano could easily have kept going (and did for another step and a half) but then threw himself to the ground when he realised he wouldn't stop Higuain from scoring. The last replay in this video shows it perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riQd1U3-FzE&feature=player_embedded
You could say the same thing for Ronaldo. If anything, the contact by Ronaldo on Mascherano was more clear cut than the one by Pique on Ronaldo.
While I think that there's barely any contact between Pique and Ronaldo, hypothetically let's say that Pique did foul Ronaldo and that caused Ronaldo to fall into Mascherano's legs. Shouldn't that just be called back for the foul by Pique. Isn't falling into someone's legs a foul? Why should the foul on Mascherano be ignored?
Ronaldo didn't foul him though. Ronaldo was fouled and as he hit the ground he made some contact with Mascherano. It was a direct result of a foul on Ronaldo, so it's play on in my eyes. Anywhere else on the field and there's not a chance that would be called back for a foul.
Also, Mascherano could easily have kept going (and did for another step and a half) but then threw himself to the ground when he realised he wouldn't stop Higuain from scoring. The last replay in this video shows it perfectly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riQd1U3-FzE&feature=player_embedded