A few red flags from the post earlier outlining NS demands. Not sure NZ would support 4 home games in Sydney.
What other bids/consortiums does WA have?
No bid should accept those demands. I think they have two other consortiums
A few red flags from the post earlier outlining NS demands. Not sure NZ would support 4 home games in Sydney.
What other bids/consortiums does WA have?
Yeh but that’s not what’s been mentionedNo bid should accept those demands. I think they have two other consortiums
Yeh but that’s not what’s been mentioned
if the reports are correct the bears are getting the license and will go wherever the nrl tells them
four games is too much but the way it’s looking is the bears will own this 100 percent
2 games at nso and bears owning it is a great outcomeIf that’s true than that is just dumb (if the Bears have the attitude that they do). Playing home games in Sydney (especially four of them) is wasting an opportunity to expand the game. You and I know what will happen as a result.
TBh its not even a relocation thats needed, the Bears will still be in NS as they are now.Why would he be bitter? He is a Manly fan.
He just doesn’t want a true expansion spot (NZ, Perth or wherever else) being possibly screwed up because a team wants to remain a Sydney side in spirit. If they truly relocated then we could see the benefits and be supportive of it
Last count there were 3 interested bidders leading possible consortiums. Tony Sage (Glory owner), Peter Cumins (WC Pirates backer) and Laurie Puddy (ex Reds chairman who wants Reds brand back). We know from the news story in June there is at least one serious consortium formed and ready to put a bid on the table.A few red flags from the post earlier outlining NS demands. Not sure NZ would support 4 home games in Sydney.
What other bids/consortiums does WA have?
Dude is sore coz manly cant pick the eyes out of the ns area, not that they ever tried to spread wings (pun intended) and sourced juniors from CC like they could...Why would he be bitter? He is a Manly fan.
He just doesn’t want a true expansion spot (NZ, Perth or wherever else) being possibly screwed up because a team wants to remain a Sydney side in spirit. If they truly relocated then we could see the benefits and be supportive of it
This one hundred percent spot onDude is sore coz manly cant pick the eyes out of the ns area, not that they ever tried to spread wings (pun intended) and sourced juniors from CC like they could...
Manly should be 100% behind this bid, coz if it goes well, eventually perth starts blossoming their own pathways, and the bears will stay focused there... forever... leaving the north shore up for grabs, but alas manly be dumb
Bedumb... bedum..bedum!!
Its not to different to whats happened to southern sydney, cronulla have taken over the bay area, the more dragons have concentrated in Illawarra region
Salty? That would be the people still bitter at Manly for the events of 20+ years ago.
Cronulla haven’t officially taken over anything, the St George comp has just withered on the vine to the point where their teams sometimes need to play in Cronulla’s comp to survive, just like Norths’ junior teams have played in Manly’s comps on and off since they were booted. That’s not a positive, it’s just another example of a suboptimal arrangement in RL. Look at it from an outsider’s perspective- does it make sense to have St George cover the St George area, have a big gap in the shire, then cover the Illawarra? No, it doesn’t. Does it make sense for a dead NRL team to cover the North Shore? No, it doesn’t.Dude is sore coz manly cant pick the eyes out of the ns area, not that they ever tried to spread wings (pun intended) and sourced juniors from CC like they could...
Manly should be 100% behind this bid, coz if it goes well, eventually perth starts blossoming their own pathways, and the bears will stay focused there... forever... leaving the north shore up for grabs, but alas manly be dumb
Bedumb... bedum..bedum!!
Its not to different to whats happened to southern sydney, cronulla have taken over the bay area, the more dragons have concentrated in Illawarra region
Cronulla have the 2nd biggest junior base in Sydney, you think that happened overnight?Salty? That would be the people still bitter at Manly for the events of 20+ years ago.
Cronulla haven’t officially taken over anything, the St George comp has just withered on the vine to the point where their teams sometimes need to play in Cronulla’s comp to survive, just like Norths’ junior teams have played in Manly’s comps on and off since they were booted. That’s not a positive, it’s just another example of a suboptimal arrangement in RL. Look at it from an outsider’s perspective- does it make sense to have St George cover the St George area, have a big gap in the shire, then cover the Illawarra? No, it doesn’t. Does it make sense for a dead NRL team to cover the North Shore? No, it doesn’t.
I don’t know why you think the Bears will happily give up the North Shore after a move to WA. If the NRL give them their list of demands, it will legitimise them hanging on to it (and hang on for dear life, they will), leaving the north of Sydney trapped in a suboptimal arrangement. You’ll have the Bears feeding into WA, with a weak presence on the North Shore, and Manly on the Northern Beaches. That’s not having the area live up to its potential.
You'd think this would happen for the 1st few seasons, but officially settle in perth, with a proper COE and club set up near the stadium..A concerning thing to consider given NS Bears demands are that the club would end up playing 16 games on the East coast and only 8 on the west Coast. How long before Bears relocated the team to the East coast to save travel and costs and just flew into Perth for the 8 'home' games?
That will definately perpetuate the perception that they are FIFO Sydney club and not a Perth club. Great way to not get WA behind them lolYou'd think this would happen for the 1st few seasons, but officially settle in perth, with a proper COE and club set up near the stadium..
But thats only me guessing, couldn't do straightaway
They haven’t swallowed up anything. St George teams that can’t put a comp together are playing in the Cronulla comp, that’s it. Cronulla’s numbers are impressive, but they haven’t taken over St George’s area officially, all those old structures are still in place. As I was saying, it’s an indictment on the suboptimal arrangements in place. It would be good if all those teams in the St George and Cronulla regions all played in the one comp across all ages and fed into one team. Instead we’ve got St George split across the old St George region and the Illawarra region and Cronulla in the middle.Cronulla have the 2nd biggest junior base in Sydney, you think that happened overnight?
Keep on slaming reallity dude.. Stgeorges bay area has been swallowed up right under their noses... they didn't even have norths being in the nsw cup as an equivalent like manly has..
I’ve set out the reasons why I don’t think they should get a licence, unless it’s a complete, wholesale relocation. Their language all along makes it clear how important they view retaining the North Shore, it’s as if their new region is an afterthought- it’s all about how many games they can get in Sydney, their ownership, their brand etc.Yes you are very salty.. i get everyone has an opinion on whether the WA bears would work, but you carry on as if they don't deserve to exist, let alone vye for the next licence...
There's plenty on this very site, who suggest manly shouldn't either, being stuck in the small corner of the peninsula of north eastern sydney, I'm not like that.. i value all the brands that came before... including the bears
In other words you don't want north shore area to end up like the bay area... touchèThey haven’t swallowed up anything. St George teams that can’t put a comp together are playing in the Cronulla comp, that’s it. Cronulla’s numbers are impressive, but they haven’t taken over St George’s area officially, all those old structures are still in place. As I was saying, it’s an indictment on the suboptimal arrangements in place. It would be good if all those teams in the St George and Cronulla regions all played in the one comp across all ages and fed into one team. Instead we’ve got St George split across the old St George region and the Illawarra region and Cronulla in the middle.
I’ve set out the reasons why I don’t think they should get a licence, unless it’s a complete, wholesale relocation. Their language all along makes it clear how important they view retaining the North Shore, it’s as if their new region is an afterthought- it’s all about how many games they can get in Sydney, their ownership, their brand etc.
Allowing them to retain the North Shore and get their demands doesn’t help many, other than themselves and those who want to indulge in the nostalgia of a Bears return. Indulging that nostalgia isn’t worth compromising the potential success of a stand-alone WA team, nor is it worth trapping northern Sydney in suboptimal territorial arrangements. We have enough of them in RL, we don’t need more.
This, All the the language I have heard from the Bears camp has been about rekindling the old brand and connecting to the existing Bears fans in Sydney, not expansion and growth in Perth. Should be a huge red flag for the NRL.They haven’t swallowed up anything. St George teams that can’t put a comp together are playing in the Cronulla comp, that’s it. Cronulla’s numbers are impressive, but they haven’t taken over St George’s area officially, all those old structures are still in place. As I was saying, it’s an indictment on the suboptimal arrangements in place. It would be good if all those teams in the St George and Cronulla regions all played in the one comp across all ages and fed into one team. Instead we’ve got St George split across the old St George region and the Illawarra region and Cronulla in the middle.
I’ve set out the reasons why I don’t think they should get a licence, unless it’s a complete, wholesale relocation. Their language all along makes it clear how important they view retaining the North Shore, it’s as if their new region is an afterthought- it’s all about how many games they can get in Sydney, their ownership, their brand etc.
Allowing them to retain the North Shore and get their demands doesn’t help many, other than themselves and those who want to indulge in the nostalgia of a Bears return. Indulging that nostalgia isn’t worth compromising the potential success of a stand-alone WA team, nor is it worth trapping northern Sydney in suboptimal territorial arrangements. We have enough of them in RL, we don’t need more.
Mmmmmm.... pvl doesn't seem to think so..This, All the the language I have heard from the Bears camp has been about rekindling the old brand and connecting to the existing Bears fans in Sydney, not expansion and growth in Perth. Should be a huge red flag for the NRL.