WA BEARS

[greenBV4]

Smallest club has 13k

talking nonsense as usual

Again, based there full time

Based on this you'd expect 3-5k from Sydney for a Perth Bears team

 

[Vibing]

The 2 biggest clubs in Sydney, based there full time, in modern stadiums, have 30k members (not season pass holders)

But a Perth team wanting to play a handful of games at a dilapidated Park footy ground will get 10k from Sydney?

Yeah unlikely

No one uses the term " season pass holders " in any sport
they're members

The GWS midgets have 30K " members " playing out of a modern stadium
&
425 season pass holders

 

[greenBV4]

No one uses the term " season pass holders " in any sport
they're members

I know
But WB did

So if 10k Sydney people become season ticket holders

Moving goalposts

I doubt they'd get 10k members of any type from Sydney playing 2 games at NSO

If they put together an away membership package with the other clubs then yes, and this doesn't require any home games at NSO (but the bears don't want that)

 

[Wb1234]

Again, based there full time

Based on this you'd expect 3-5k from Sydney for a Perth Bears team

giants have 10k members from Canberra

swans have south Melbourne fans.

bears are more iconic than both

 

[Wb1234]

I know
But WB did

Moving goalposts

I doubt they'd get 10k members of any type from Sydney playing 2 games at NSO

If they put together an away membership package with the other clubs then yes, and this doesn't require any home games at NSO (but the bears don't want that)

You can doubt a lot of thing doesn’t mean they aren’t true

when it comes to this topic I would suggest you are one of those Sydney ignorami

 

[Pneuma]

I don’t know why anybody bothers quoting member numbers anymore. They are basically meaningless unless you know the club’s rationale for counting them. For some with bigger numbers these can include people on a club mailing list. But go ahead anyway

 

[Wb1234]

I don’t know why anybody bothers quoting member numbers anymore. They are basically meaningless unless you know the club’s rationale for counting them. For some with bigger numbers these can include people on a club mailing list. But go ahead anyway

South’s make around 3 million a year off membership sales

bears should be able to pull 1 million just from Sydney imo

 

[Pneuma]

South’s make around 3 million a year off membership sales

bears should be able to pull 1 million just from Sydney imo

For south’s That’s at $100 a member. That’ll include full memberships, 1 game memberships, everything in between and who knows what else? Sharks average $130 a member which the old turd from WA queried. For the bears to get 1 million dollars in memberships based on the above they will need far more than 10000 members if the side is only playing a small number of games in Sydney unless they seriously overcharge for them.

 

[Wb1234]

For south’s That’s at $100 a member. That’ll include full memberships, 1 game memberships, everything in between and who knows what else? Sharks average $130 a member which the old turd from WA queried. For the bears to get 1 million dollars in memberships based on the above they will need far more than 10000 members if the side is only playing a small number of games in Sydney unless they seriously overcharge for them.

I reckon they’ll get more than 10k from Sydney tbh

 

[Vibing]

South’s make around 3 million a year off membership sales

bears should be able to pull 1 million just from Sydney imo

memberships & merchandising maybe
not from 1 or 2 game memberships tho, $50 is all you'd charge for one game a cap , scarf & bumper sticker

 

[Wb1234]

Just throwing this out there for discussion

1. north Sydney leagues support ? 1 million pa

2. Membership / merchandise / game day revenue 2 million pa ?

3. corporate support north shore 1 to 2 million pa

this is in addition to tv grant and money made from Perth (or png etc)

 

[greenBV4]

giants have 10k members from Canberra

swans have south Melbourne fans.

bears are more iconic than both

Look whose talking about AFL again

I'm sure everyone here would agree on calling that bullshit aswell

 

[Wb1234]

Look whose talking about AFL again

I'm sure everyone here would agree on calling that bullshit aswell

You asked for examples you dope

 

[Perth Red]

Just throwing this out there for discussion

1. north Sydney leagues support ? 1 million pa

2. Membership / merchandise / game day revenue 2 million pa ?

3. corporate support north shore 1 to 2 million pa

this is in addition to tv grant and money made from Perth (or png etc)

pure speculation

 

[Wb1234]

pure speculation

Perths loss is pngs gain I guess

 

[greenBV4]

You asked for examples you dope

And yet when you do the same and get a similar response you have a grand old time calling people afl lovers

 

[Wb1234]

And yet when you do the same and get a similar response you have a grand old time calling people afl lovers

Nope

obviously you can’t argue back against the examples I gave so that means you’ve lost the argument

 

[greenBV4]

I did
First you've ignored the fact you moved goalposts and changed your initial statement of season ticket holder to member

Second, its well known AFL use a very special counter for all things GWS

Third, as Pneuma and Vibing stated, any revenue from 1-2 game memberships would be far less impactful than you are leading on

The Bears are far less important to a (reportedly) financially and governmnent backed bid like perth than you think, if they dropped their non negotiables would they bring some potentially nice side benfit? Yes
Are they necessary? No

 

[Perth Red]

Perths loss is pngs gain I guess

more like perths near miss is PNG's pain lol

 

[Wb1234]

more like perths near miss is PNG's pain lol

Funny but won’t be funny when Perth has to wait ten years

oh well you’ve already waited 20 years what’s ten more