What story exactly did I change? The one you tried to put into my mouth to suit your Gumpist posting agendas
.
Nothing has changed from the stated facts - Arthur missed a tackle, and the tackle he missed happen to lead to a try. Though you've been busy trying to come up with a story to seemingly argue (for the sake of arguing?) that there was nothing at all wrong with him missing a tackle, and that individual responsibility for missing a tackle is not something that should be focussed on if a try might be scored as a result?