Jerkwad2000
Juniors
- Messages
- 114
I don't have strong feelings either way but am very curious as to why it would be an 'absolute disgrace'?
it would be a disgrace because here you have a club who it was reported to be hundreds of thousands of dollars over the salary cap, who have been paying players in brown paper bags in car parks etc etc etc etc, being allowed to "medically retire" a player with known knee issues, not having to have Will Hoppas money counted against them, and now possibly being allowed to end the contract of their club captain, in order to be able to sign a player that, prior to his departure, would have been one of the highest paid players in the game, and probably still will be.
That's why it's a disgrace. A disgrace that the corrupt organisation known as the NRL would allow it. But what can you expect from an organisation that allows a player that played over 200 games for a club to officiate their games?