azzah72
Bench
- Messages
- 4,202
WW84 - so disappointed...
really liked the first film and thought it was the best DC film since Nolan.
this was utter garbage... I actually think Patty Jenkins is a f**king great filmmaker... but I don’t know what the f**k this was.
The tone was odd... I could see she was trying to bring in shades of Donner’s Superman which considering the time period made some sense... but there’s better ways to give it that 80’s feel than making it camp as hell.
Taika Waititi’s Thor Ragnarok ran that 80’s theme much better by using visuals and clever use of synth in the score...
The story was a mess... in the end there was no real stakes... and Chris Pyne was really just used as a comedic plot device to play the fish out of water role...
the CGI was comical at times and I just don’t get what Jenkins was thinking.
she’s better than this garbage... atleast I thought she was...
Tend to agree, there's a great idea and concept in this movie but the writing is no good.
Biggest issue for me outside of the story faults is there was such little action.
In a 2.5 hr movie that could have easily been 2, was there 4 actions scenes in total? Amounting to about 20 mins?
A tighter story and editing, it could have been great because there was a cool idea in there but not to be.