Doesnt change the rule book, Masoe. It's just JT the referee creamer explaining the integrity of his club.........
I know, but surely the ref should have some authority and discrepancy with these things.
Segayaro caught him sweet, but there was nothing in it. He went to wrap up Issac as he should, and unfortunately caught his face with his hands on the way down. Players do get caught in the face with arms all the time.
Would the ref have ruled on that if Luke didn't stay down? Surely not, because there was little in it.
Rules is rules but lets not get cynical like Yawnion and rule on every little thing. By penalising Segeyaro in that situation what you're basically doing is promoting the dive. You're saying to players that if there's contact with the face, however accidental or minor, they can milk it and get their team a penalty.
The rule wasn't intended for petty mishaps like that. In that situation the ref should use his authority and better judgement and say okay, 6 more tackles, get on with it. Refs aren't all stupid, I think they know the difference between something malicious and ill-intended and the mistake we saw in the Rabbitohs - Cowboys game. The players know it too. If that was a genuine and purposeful high shot the Rabbitohs would have been in there, swarming James Segeyaro.
That's just my take on it. I don't like referees ruling on the result of a players actions rather than the action itself. Yes the result was bad, that's unfortunate - But the action was a f**king nothing action.
It's not his go, as you say down under :lol: