Band On The Run
Juniors
- Messages
- 441
Don't mind Souths, would probably go for them if I was from Sydney.
That son of a bitch. Let's get him!I don't hate Souths. There is one annoying poster who has absolutely NFI about rugby league, yet consistently pops up with the most ludicrous comments in posts... You can tell the bloke is a sycophantic liar of epic proportions.
- That stupid merkin who has a pic of Jack Rayner (sp?) in his sig.
I don't hate Souths. There is one annoying poster who has absolutely NFI about rugby league, yet consistently pops up with the most ludicrous comments in posts... You can tell the bloke is a sycophantic liar of epic proportions.
Everyone knows that Souffs should only be used on a "LOL by LOL" basis.
Sounds like everyone who gets mad at me.You take offence at a bunch of shit-stirring on teh interwebz because you think it's a personal insult against some people you know/are related to? That'll do me. That'd be like me taking Raiders_Spooners and STD's constant taunts that all Saints fans are utter f**kwits to heart. Anyone who has two brain cells to rub together realises that such generalisations are pure bullshit and are designed purely to stir shit and get a rise out of opposition supporters. Lighten up a bit mate. ;-)
And this is why we LOL @ 50uffs idiots like you :lol:
News ltd let you back in
HAw Haw Haw , what an idiot you are , another revisionist.
Souths won the court case in 2001 and were BACK in the competition in 2002. So News did not let us back in, you dope.
The high court decision you quote was in 2003 , derrrr
they were illegally kicked out.So stick it!
News ltd let you back in[/QUOTE]
haw haw haw
expected you to come back a little softer . You continue to be dope.
The 2001 court case victory got Souths back in for 2002 , not a 2003 court case victory for NEWS in 2003.
Checkmate dope
they were illegally kicked out.So stick it!
:lol:
You can backpedal, and squirm as much as you want too Galefarce but you know that the high court case showed that News LTD actions were legal ;-)
Build a bridge and get over it
why don't one of you post a link to a reputable article because right now you both look geniusedThe 2001 court case is the bridge . Winning that got Souths back into 2002 competition. Winning the 2001 court case meant that Souths were illegally kicked out. Winning that court case got Souths back in.
The 2003 court case was not relevant to getting Souths back in for 2002.You build a bridge you dope as to why a 2003 court case loss got Souths back in 2002 , you dope.