I'm still not sold on a particular form of a 2nd brisbane team, but I know we need one.
Do we all agree that Suncorp should be the venue?
The next QLD team into the NRL after the entry of the CC Bears and WA Reds should be a Brisbane team - called them Brothers or the Diehards - two clubs that the Bronco's killed.
But where should they play - Lang Park and that way Brisbane can watch a game every weekend.
Rocky has Bundaberg a three hour drive away and it has Rum.
The Brisbane Diehards ...I LOVE IT!!!
How good would that be - bringing back the spirit of the Diehards (Brisbane's most successful RL club) through a 2nd Brisbane NRL team.
Most of the old BRL fans would immediately jump on board.
I've mentioned this before - I think it's a massive shame that Ballymore is so close to Suncorp. Otherwise if you improved transport links to it, it would be the ideal venue for a new club.
26,000 seats, very modern ground and would be the ideal way to help differentiate the side from the Bronco's.
But it's proximity to Suncorp means it's unlikely.
Having an NRL team play in a sh*tty stadium in a horrible location that he has never been to is his 'thing'. Let him dream.No to mention being the traditional home of Union??
Lang Park is the home of Rugby League in Brisbane, why not play there???
What's wrong with the Sunshine Coast getting a team? SC Dolphins anyone?
I disagree, Diehards were one team, fans of Wests, Norths, Wynnum etc. HATED Valleys.
:roll:
Yes, I've been to Ballymore. It's better than just about every club ground in Sydney.
Why base a new club that will struggle for support in a 52,000 seat behemoth? Playing out of a more intimate setting in their own ground would help them get off the ground.
And get over the union factor. It's a 26,000 seat stadium, who gives a sh*t what's traditionally been played there?
:roll:
Yes, I've been to Ballymore. It's better than just about every club ground in Sydney.
Why base a new club that will struggle for support in a 52,000 seat behemoth? Playing out of a more intimate setting in their own ground would help them get off the ground.
And get over the union factor. It's a 26,000 seat stadium, who gives a sh*t what's traditionally been played there?
Yes but that was a long time ago and any hatred these teams had towards the likes of Brothers and Valleys has evaporated. It's now all fond memories.
The Brisbane Diehards would be a lasting symbol for the old BRL and I reckon many of the old fans would jump on board if marketed correctly.
Great name too.
But keep coming up with ideas for a 2nd Brisbane team peoples. There's probably a better one than this out there. I'm sure there is.
If the QLD Reds can play out of Suncorp then so can a 2nd Brisbane NRL team.
Just putting this out there. All of the other Queensland teams have names taken from the NFL. If I was a betting man I'd be having a look here. http://www.nfl.com/teams
Jets, Dolphins or Giants would be worth a shout.
For the second brisbane team I'd go with the name Brisbane Jets. I wouldn't call them Ipswich because it somewhat limits the appeal for someone not living in Ipswich. Either "Brisbane" or "South Queensland" for the name. Have them play in traditional Jets colours (Dark Green) and play all games out of Suncorp.
Great. Now Queenslanders are copying seppos ffs!
The Jets were blue, not green. Canberra is Green. Randwick are green. Newtown was definitely blue.