mozza91 said:What f**king rubbsh kicking M Johns when he's down.
The twigs need to stop bitching about how they are treated and start worrying about how they're going to burn in hell.
What f**king rubbsh kicking M Johns when he's down.
The twigs need to stop bitching about how they are treated and start worrying about how they're going to burn in hell.
Oh Reefy,is that all you think about.That a f**king disgraceful thing to say. Making fun of dead guys who were good blokes obviously isnt a sin in your f**ked up church is it you low life?
Spot on.You're selling goangod out there. He was so much more than that, and so very entertaining. He particularly hated me, I'm sad that he's gone.
Ahh, what a complex issue. Here is where we see the true ignorant attitudes flourish. See, those seeking to dismiss the idea that people could be so offended by such a sketch that they would seek redress by legal means are really shifting the goalposts of the argument.
They're saying "so what if I call someone a nice person, it's affectionate!" when what was said in the sketch was that to be gay is to be defective, to have something wrong with you, to be almost sub-human. If "Elton Johns" were simply described as a nice person, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Hate to break it to you guys, but that's not the same as giving someone an affectionate ribbing.
What amuses me most though is when anyone has their homophobic views challenged, they immediately retort that the challenger is a moral crusader rather than trying to address the issue. When you resort to name-calling, you've got nothing.
The funny thing is, most of these posters seem rather rational in other threads, yet always resort to what, to me, seems to be an irrational fear of what's different. Except for blacktip-reefy, Raudonikis and millersnose, who are clearly insane.
Just my opinion of course.
Hey Skeepe, what part of most blonde jokes demonstrates that although they're really stupid, they're not defective or sub-human?
Absolutely spot on!See, you're trying to rationalise but it's not that simple. A lot of it is to do with the history of the discrimination.
When have blondes ever been killed just for being blonde?
When have blondes been excommunicated from their church just for being blonde?
When have blondes ever been sacked from their jobs just for being blonde?
When have blondes ever been rejected by their families and society in general just for being blonde?
When you can answer those questions, then perhaps your comparison might hold some water. Until then it's an absolutely ridiculous analogy.
Oh dear....trying to hide your blatantly obvious homphobia through 'Science'.I hate living in a society where faggotry is not only rife, but promoted.
When are we going to drop the PC sharade and acknowledge that these people have something wrong with them. Mentally or genetically.
The medias pro-gay agenda to defend big business and corrupt government is sickening.
Spot on.Skeepe, if I've interprested him correctly is making two point about the level of harm that various 'jokes/comments' are able to inflict and the varying level of sensitivity due to past occurrences.
As the groups he mentioned have suffered significantly as a result of discrimination against the skin colour etc, he is arguing that the potential harm is greater for them, as would be the level of sensitivity, again if I have got it right.
And there it is ladies and gentlemen.knew it was too good to be true...
Again, 1950s called and want their f**king idiot back!Far out if it was normal people wouldnt make jokes about it.
If gays realise that we come from a man and a women and that is how us earthlings breed.
If your gay your not normal and have a mental disease. If its normal then why cant women on women make kids or man on man make kids.
Fact of life Get over it you pancys
Oh god isn't he?!:lol:W
I do believe I was calling you pompous - because you are.
I'll follow the rest and laugh at you:lol:What f**king rubbsh kicking M Johns when he's down.
The twigs need to stop bitching about how they are treated and start worrying about how they're going to burn in hell.
Oh dear....trying to hide your blatantly obvious homphobia through 'Science'.
Do you honestly think you're fooling anyone but staying up til god knows when on the internet until you find a blog that satisfies your hatred with some scientist that has theories on it?
Look Millers, I don't expect the Footy show to be sued or whatever.so shorty
which of these subjects are open for ridicule and which arent
christianity
islam
transgenderism
footy players portrayed as blockheads
women enjoying sex
homosexuality
please tell us so we may moderate our humour to whatever you declare to be fair game
I am a girl.i always just assumed you were a girl shorty
anyways
can you answer my question
I am a girl.
Girl = Womans I thought?
PS Dutchy I know, maybe I need a rainbow signature or something:roll: