What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

18th club, whose next?

Messages
14,822
Yes plus some discussions with the 1902 Canadian Rugby touring team as they explained the then gridiron rules with their 11 man team, 4 downs(tackles) and healing the ball to restart a tackle
Doesn't Canadian football use three downs and have a 12th player on each team?
 
  • Like
Reactions: siv

flippikat

First Grade
Messages
5,260
Yeah it's a funny one. There's been a few quotes from V'landys and Abdo that hint at the fact that a winning bid will be announced from each city with the Tigers up their sleeve if nothing suitable comes from NZ. Then they will attach a start date to each bid. E.G. Your consortium (Mr Cummins 😉) in 2027, Albo's PNG bid in 2028 and Christchurch / SEQ in 2030.

If NZ come up with something suitable, there will be some comment about the NRL taking a closer look at SEQ in the next round of expansion.
However, if NZ don't come up with something suitable then it's quite possible that Perth, PNG & SEQ get spots 18-20 and talk of expansion beyond that easily could go right to the back-burner.

There'd probably be no big compelling locations in NSW or Qld for teams 21 & 22 so the options left (NZ 2, Adelaide, Fiii most notably) would all be tough sells to traditionalists.

I know that sounds like fear-mongering, but I can see that being a roadblock to a bigger footprint.
 
Messages
14,822
However, if NZ don't come up with something suitable then it's quite possible that Perth, PNG & SEQ get spots 18-20 and talk of expansion beyond that easily could go right to the back-burner.

There'd probably be no big compelling locations in NSW or Qld for teams 21 & 22 so the options left (NZ 2, Adelaide, Fiii most notably) would all be tough sells to traditionalists.

I know that sounds like fear-mongering, but I can see that being a roadblock to a bigger footprint.
Let's hope we don't get PNG.

West Coast Pirates
South Island Kea
Brisbane Firehawks

CC Bears and Wellington would be good prospects in 2040 or 2050.
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,384
I'm all for a shortened NRL season so an international window becomes part of the package and is played every year, but it can't be everyone plays once. It sounds nice but you need to have an additional rivalry round so you can get certain must have fixtures h&a. Broncos v Dolphins is the top of that list. Two 45k+ crowds (plus ratings blockbusters).
It's why conferences would be introduced, so that those closer geographical teams can play each other twice
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,384
WA govt is paying in areas that it has a remit to. Sports infrastructure and jnr sport. They've clearly said all along they are not in the business of funding professional sports teams. And quite rightly so.
Aus govt using tax payer money to directly keep a professional sports club afloat is appalling really. And if it wasnt a RL club we were talking about you would agree no doubt.
What a crock, Australian govt fund two super rugby teams in the Pacific, Moana Pacifica and Fiji drua, no one has blinked an eye, nor do they care, but somehow it's a big deal when NRL receives the same treatment, get fkd with the hypocrisy
 
Last edited:

Iamback

Referee
Messages
20,559

Totally safe and secure. I guess the propaganda tour was limited to 5 star hotels in Port Moresby.

Yes and where are the NRL players going to stay?

Especially if the resort/Compound is built?
 

Iamback

Referee
Messages
20,559
it is very much 2 ownership entities. The WA consortium and the NSFC. Both will presumably sit on the board and no doubt there will be points of conflict . For example say in a couple of years the club wants to move the nsw cup team to be based in perth because it wants more emphasis on WA jnr pathways, but that is seriously detrimental to the NSFC. I can think of a myriad possible points of conflict re brand and pathways where the two ownership groups could be at loggerheads.

Again. How is it different than Souffs for example having multiple private ownership having different thoughts?

If John Singleton and the Hungry Jacks owner jumped onboard as the Newtown Jets. You don't think they'd want seats on the board etc?
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,888
What a crock, Australian govt fund two super rugby teams in the Pacific, Moana Pacifica and Fiji drua, no one has blinked an eye, nor do they care, but somehow it's a big deal when NRL receives the same treatment, get fkd with the hypocrisy
It’s equally bs.
Reason why is 1. It’s $10mill not $600mill (allegedly) and 2. It’s union and hasn’t garnered any attention.

all the things govt could be doing with our money to make peoples lives better bankrolling professional sports teams should be way down the bottom Of the list.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
34,464
It’s equally bs.
Reason why is 1. It’s $10mill not $600mill (allegedly) and 2. It’s union and hasn’t garnered any attention.

all the things govt could be doing with our money to make peoples lives better bankrolling professional sports teams should be way down the bottom Of the list.
Rugby league fan here folks
 
Top