Asking questions is what you should do rather than just accept things because you mightn’t like the answer.
The fact that you keep comparing an affluent city like Melbourne with that of a third world country like PNG (talk about repetition) suggests you don’t understand the problems.
This might work (anything is possible I guess) but this risk is multitudes more than putting a side in Melbourne. Not even in the same postcode.
Melbourne at one stage we’re losing 5 million pa
guess they must’ve been in the less affluent part of Melbourne
100 milllion against nine afl clubs or 600 million vs nobody
it’s funny how desperate this forum is to praise Melbourne then see risk in png
png will end up being a more sustainable club than the storm
clubs without their own juniors are going to struggle
Penrith are the benchmark now