The NRL expansion debate is one thing, righting the ship which is PNG is something else. Staying with the Rugby League theme, there are some comments and assumptions made on here that should be clarified.
1. Tribalism in rugby league is not a buzz-word in PNG. It is inherent in their social fabric based on the bloodlines of one of the last living ancient cultures of our planet. Geopolitics is a term promulgated for PNG.
2. Not all people in PNG are rugby league fanatics. It is the national sport and there is a huge following in many social segments and in various regions across the country but certainly not all.
3. Winning is the greatest attraction and losing a huge loss of face. Here is the root of game-related violence but jealousy is not too far behind. The danger for an NRL franchise is not so much to the local team, although they'd better be winning and not be too uppity about it, but to the visitors. Especially if they are winning and particularly if the result is close when tensions escalate or heaven forbid when there is foul play. I don't think I need to mention referee safety here.
5. Junior registrations have been the bane of administrations since the concept was first introduced. Of course, registration is needed, not the least for player/staff insurance as well as uniforms, training materials, ground upkeep, etc, however, it is also provides the seed for the misuse of public funds and political pork barrelling.
And just briefly on the political side of things:
1. The Southern folk of Papua and their countrymen from the Highlands, Islands and Northern regions, previously known as New Guinea, have been one country side 1975.
2. The coming elections may well see, well anything.
3. The country is largely impoverished and survives on subsistence.
And just for the record, I would very much like to see PNG/Pasifika playing in the NRL, and not out of Cairns either, but I am very sceptical as to the ability of anyone to get all the stars to align.