You bragged about the Bombers being backed by wealthy investors who have a foot in the local RL community:
I mean they've got solid money behind them (or at least they did prior to covid), they seem to have successful businessmen behind them, and they've already got strong connections in the footy community, and the money to get good footy minds behind them.
Weren't the businessmen you were talking about powerbrokers who held a position with the Broncos Thoroughbreds in the 1990s?
If so then they were as local as it gets.
So it's okay for Adelaide and Perth to have financially weak clubs that lack fans, but Brisbane 2 needed to be a carbon copy of the Broncos?
Do you know how obnoxious and stupid you sound with these double standards?
You try to come across as an intellectual, but it's obvious you've got a massive chip on your shoulder against the status quo and argue for the sake of it.
You're entitled to be a hypocrite and have a stupid opinion, but don't pretend it's a "fact". What you think should happen isn't a fact. It's just your opinion. The ARLC's refusal to embrace your opinion doesn't mean they're incompetent.
The club did make a huge mistake not playing all of its games at Lang Park.
It was dumb holding games at a venue that has a capacity of 11.5k. However, ghose games were sold out and the club drew an average of 32k fans to the 7 or 8 they played at Lang Park. The only reason you're including the games at Dolphin Ovalis because you cannot bear to admit that the Dolphins were able to draw an average attendance of 32k at Lang Park.
The Dolphins' attendances at Lang Park were just 4-5k below the Broncos'.
Reasonable people would acknowledge that the Dolphins' attendances at Lang Paek aren't far behind the Broncos'.
How many did you predict they would get at Lang Park?
I didn't abandon the club. I have health issues and commitments that make it very difficult to attend NRL games.
Why are you comparing the Dolphins with the Titans?
One club is a started from scratch with a neutral brand in a regional city. The other is a traditional BRL club from the world's second largest rugby league city.
You praised them for having a neutral brand and support from the businessmen associated with the Broncos Thoroughbreds.
I found this gem from
Sept 22 2020:
The AFL alienated a huge portion of the potential fan base for the second Adelaide club when they announced it would be Port Adelaide instead of a neutral club.
The NRL can't afford to do that in Brisbane, mainly because it's f**king stupid to knowingly alienate so many potential customers, but also because none of the QRL clubs have demonstrable support large enough to support an NRL club.
At the end of the day it really comes down to whether you want a small suburban club or a club with mass appeal. Why you'd want a suburban club that struggles to make ends meet IDK, but that is the question.
you keep picking out one metric and using it to judge whether a team in valuable or not, this time it's ratings in New Zealand. So Perth is not valuable because people in NZ won't watch them? seriously? Who said Skysports is going to fork out big money for a second NZ team anyway? do they even...
forums.leagueunlimited.com
The Dolphins drew an average of 32k fans to Lang Park over 7 or 8 games. That suggests their fanbase is more than big enough to make ends meet. Just accept you are wrong. Everyone can see it but you.