KeepingTheFaith
Referee
- Messages
- 25,235
I'd actually back NZ to chase 250+ more than I would for them to chase 170-180 on a regular basis. They seem to play better when nothing is expected of them.
A hearty congratulations to the third umpire. Vettori should never have been there to hit the winning runs.
A hearty congratulations to the third umpire. Vettori should never have been there to hit the winning runs.
Yeah cos those 2 are coming off a brilliant series against the West Indies, the Aussies should be very worried :lol:Ryder back in, McCullum getting a decent run, and suddenly I doubt that
Yeah cos those 2 are coming off a brilliant series against the West Indies, the Aussies should be very worried :lol:
Its the Kiwis, Australia shouldnt worry about any of them, just worry about batting sensiblyLOL...So we shouldn't sweat two of their best three batsmen? Riiiiiiiiight.........
Its the Kiwis, Australia shouldnt worry about any of them, just worry about batting sensibly
But why assume that McCullum and Ryder are just going to suddenly find form? You got that little faith in Australias bowlers? Besides atm the Kiwis wouldnt be worrying about Clarke and who would in his form? But under your logic they should be terrified of him :lol:
*edit*
Its a case the batsman didnt know the rulesThe ball hit the stump, you can hear it...but Hadds had already broken the bails...Poor effort from Bucknor and a sh*t rule that the TV umpire can't intervene
i didn't seei t ( was in bed by that stage) but did the umpire raise his finger? IF he did you can't just stand your ground, you have to goThe batsman fault for walking off if he had doubts he should have stand his ground, so its wasnt the umpires fault that the third umpire wasnt use it was the batsman himself for not staying out there.