- Messages
- 101,004
That would be Saints not Souths.I thought i read somewhere that souFFS have gone with Reebok for next season as their apparel?
It's called freedom to trade.and whats with clubs signing up with ISC as their jersey apparel?
That would be Saints not Souths.I thought i read somewhere that souFFS have gone with Reebok for next season as their apparel?
It's called freedom to trade.and whats with clubs signing up with ISC as their jersey apparel?
It's called freedom to trade.
He's asking why it is, not why it's allowed.
I find it an interesting question really, particularly given their recent financial difficulty.
Quite a few one team apparel sponsors next year too...
Nike - Brisbane
Adidas - GC
Reebok - Saints
Hummel - North Queensland
Canterbury - New Zealand
Then Kooga x 2 and X-Blades x 2 and finally 7 with ISC.
http://www.penrithpanthers.com.au/default.aspx?s=article-display&id=20056
![]()
I think this looks great.
The design is simple and looks really good.
The rubber bulps on the jersey will help with ball control (THANK GOD).
I think its really good...i'll be buying one. Better than any other TEAL one we've had...and best away jersey we've produced in a LONG time.
He's asking why it is, not why it's allowed.
I find it an interesting question really, particularly given their recent financial difficulty.
Quite a few one team apparel sponsors next year too...
Nike - Brisbane
Adidas - GC
Reebok - Saints
Hummel - North Queensland
Canterbury - New Zealand
Then Kooga x 2 and X-Blades x 2 and finally 7 with ISC.
the new Cowboys polos I have seen look quite good, one can only pray the new alternate jersey Hummel is creating is half decent as well.
Reebok for Saints is official.
http://www.dragons.com.au/default.a...id=21143&dragons-announce-new-apparel-sponsor
is this for season 2010? i didnt know we were getting a new jersey. I dont mind the current alternate one (for its simplicity) but id be interested to see what they come up with.
i saw canterbury cc make like a broncos jersey/polo that looked heaps good.it had maroon and yellow horizontal stripes
He's asking why it is, not why it's allowed.
I find it an interesting question really, particularly given their recent financial difficulty.
Quite a few one team apparel sponsors next year too...
Nike - Brisbane
Adidas - GC
Reebok - Saints
Hummel - North Queensland
Canterbury - New Zealand
Then Kooga x 2 and X-Blades x 2 and finally 7 with ISC.
That would be Saints not Souths.
It's called freedom to trade.
7/16 = nearly all?its quite interesting to see that nearly of the NRL team are with ISC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmah
That would be Saints not Souths.
It's called freedom to trade.
Lol Timmah you know you my dogg but you dont GOT to get involved in every fight, every war, every 2 dolla battle on the forum.
Let it be, just relax, chill, pop a pill and let them eat demselves.
We need you on the park in the blue and white to replace Beastwood because you a warrior!