age.s
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,817
As good as that sounds, i really don't want to go down the path of the AFL and having something like 4-5 teams playing out of one venue.
Imagine if ANZ was a 60-70k seater rectangular cauldron purpose built for footy. Think Suncorp on roids or a slightly smaller San Siro. Something that wouldn't feel empty if 25k showed for a Tigers-Knights match, but big enough to give an incredible atmosphere when Parra play the Dogs in the semis. To have it in a central location would be unbelievable for Rugby League, not only for the convenience factor, but because going to a RL game would mean you'd get to experience an atmosphere we just don't get more than once or twice a year.
Suburban grounds shouldn't be turfed out completely, but neither should they be the only answer for Sydney clubs. Each club playing 3/4 games a year at their suburban ground for lower drawing matches or where there is a schedule conflict would allow us to pay homage to our roots without standing in the way of growing the sport.
The reason the AFL get such great crowd numbers is because they have 2 stadiums perfect for their sport that are no more than 30ks away from most of the city's residents (not sure if that's spot on details wise). RL would rival that popularity if it had a ground that was suitable, and it will become more viable if we continue to see these increases in membership numbers. IMO it should be something the NRL looks at when the money becomes available.