It's like comparing Shitchell pearce to Joey Johns.
Comparing Hughes to Trott & Amla is fairly laughable. Hughes' average is more comparable to someone like Ian Healy.
Seriously, how the hell did you soapophobes put up with being this shit for the best part of 20 years? Or does the ingrained Pommy pessimism help with not being too dissapointed? It's more frustrating than watching Peter Wallace and Scott Prince trying to work out what the f**k to do 10 meters out from the try line.
It's not a question of being test quality or not. It's a question of being one of the 6 best batsmen your country has. Watson and Hughes certainly are.
I love how England handle reviews.
Hughes got 81 not out IN THE LAST TEST. Even with his last 2 failures he's probably been our best top 6 batsman with that score alone so far in these ashes.It is about being test quality. And they aren't, evidenced by their mediocre averages in a batsmen friendly era with shorter boundaries & more favourable pitches.
You'd expect even average batsmen to jag a century once every year.
I'm just gutted we have to wait 3 years to play Australia in a Test series. We'd be our best chance to win a series against them in the last 25 years or however long its been.
Wato, you're dead right, but your argument will be fruitless against that dickhead BM.
Hughes has struggled to have an average that rivals a competent number 7 or 8 batsmen for quite some time now against quality opposition.
He is not test quality sadly. Neither is Watson, Warner or Cowan imo.
But they'll keep getting picked.