would have liked to have seen Cutting get a run, shame about his injury
this might be Starc's last chance for a while so lets hope he settles down and bit and bowls as well as he has done in first class cricket
I don't understand the logic of picking Christian. He hasn't been setting the world on fire at shield level. He's nearly 30 so he's not some young prodigy. He has "mediocre" written all over him and we couldn't find anyone else to be cover in case of an injury in warm up?
I don't understand the logic of picking Christian. He hasn't been setting the world on fire at shield level. He's nearly 30 so he's not some young prodigy. He has "mediocre" written all over him and we couldn't find anyone else to be cover in case of an injury in warm up?
They'll probably go the same XI. But if Phil Hughes fails again in Hobart he'll probably get dropped again for the India series.
Well they would have to make SOMEONE miss a shield game for nothing. So they pick the average player who should never wear the baggy green.It sounds like Christian is a real chance of playing. I think he might be as well because you are not going to make him miss a shield game for nothing.
Having an all rounder for the sake of having an all rounder is dumb. Someone that isn't that good at batting OR bowling isn't an "all rounder", that's a "no rounder".So you have checked his stats out for hit season then?? :crazy:
They want an all rounder that is why he was selected.
Well done. Your carer lets you on the net and instead of an intelligent reply debating or agreeing with the points I made, you just attack me personally.You had never heard of Dan Christian until he was brought in as a replacement for Cutting. Stop talking shit.
I don't understand the logic of picking Christian. He hasn't been setting the world on fire at shield level. He's nearly 30 so he's not some young prodigy. He has "mediocre" written all over him and we couldn't find anyone else to be cover in case of an injury in warm up?
Well done. Your carer lets you on the net and instead of an intelligent reply debating or agreeing with the points I made, you just attack me personally.
Nothing I said was wrong, he's crap. He shouldn't be in the team.
Having an all rounder for the sake of having an all rounder is dumb. Someone that isn't that good at batting OR bowling isn't an "all rounder", that's a "no rounder".
The link above says he averages 34 in first class cricket... that's about the way he bowled in the test...
There's some promise in your bowlers, but our batting lineup is pretty soft...
I think he will be a good bowler, left arm swing @ 145ks but he's only 20 or 21
I think there is potential there but we just need to be patient I reckon
I think he will be a good bowler, left arm swing @ 145ks but he's only 20 or 21
I think there is potential there but we just need to be patient I reckon
Whatever happened to Bollinger? Is he injured?
The end result was the same as Johnson, but I agree - looked promising - got swing in the first innings, the action looks like he'll get that more regularly than Johnson...
With Cummins and Pattison, thinks look ok for the next few years for you... Khawaja too... still hate what I see from Hughes, he will not be able to score consistently at test level with that approach - and the evidence is there now, regardless of what he does in Hobart, or in first class cricket... he'll score centuries relatively regularly, but I suspect you'll be 1/20 much more often than you'd like...
Has Bollinger been consigned to the Katich 'never to play tests again' category?