jason taylor
Bench
- Messages
- 3,516
Mayby its all part of Hagans master plan to drop Tim smith and have the halves green and Finch
jayjayselmes said:then maybe it should be
6. MArsh
7. Green
or
6. Finch
7. Green
although i hate finch
spiderdan said:it will very probably end up being:
6. green/finch
7. smith
13. mateo (if he stays)
i thought you were banned from here jayjay. what gives?
cardinal said:I stand corrected I thought Blake had his first year in jf in 2005, Plenty of players are on 200,000 and play off the bench how do you know hagan will not play marsh as starting hooker, riddell as a backrower on the bench, start green at 5/8 and play finch (if he comes) off the bench. If green is as impressive as you say he will get his chance I'd rather see him played later than to soon, and unless you have been talking to hagan lately I dont think you would have a clue what his plans are for next year, just as I dont. You sound like Ray Hadley when you call Brian Smith a disease, have some respect for what he did for this club, listen to peter sterling if you want an opinion on where the club is at now from when smith took over.
Kornstar said:Brian Smith may have done plenty for this club, imo he also did plenty wrong for this club too. I do not have to like him, there is no law that says i must, i am glad he is gone and i can say whatever i like about him!!
I do not want Finch at the club, however if he comes i i will have to support him and hopefully if his form warrants it, he will be dropped accordingly, same goes for all players who are not performing!!
I do agree with a lot you say but sorry mate, that is just crap. If Green has the quality and skill you say he has, and I don't doubt you, and he plays better than the contenders for his position then he will get the job. That is absolutely no different to how any first grader originally forced their way in, including Hindmarsh, Tim Smith and even Kenny and Sterling ffs. It's never been any other way.Kornstar said:All this talk about if Blake is good enough he will play is crap, Jarryd Hayne has proven that he was ready for NRL alot sooner than we bought him in, it was only that disease who prohibited him from playing!! Just cause someone is good enough, doesn't always mean they will play!
Gronk said:They need Finch because you cant rely on two rookies to be the cornerstone of your team. If they are all you have and simply fail at the top grade then your season is over from the go. The club invest something in the order of $10M per year in having a successful team. They make decissions to ensure the best possible success. If that means that Blake gets upset because he doesn't have a dream run to firsts, then welcome to the real world Blake.
CrazyEel said:I do agree with a lot you say but sorry mate, that is just crap. If Green has the quality and skill you say he has, and I don't doubt you, and he plays better than the contenders for his position then he will get the job. That is absolutely no different to how any first grader originally forced their way in, including Hindmarsh, Tim Smith and even Kenny and Sterling ffs. It's never been any other way.
ParraManiac said:Kornstar it all depends on what kind of person Blake is. Is he the type who can overcome adversity and relishes a challenge? Or is he another Jamie Lyon spitting the dummy and taking his bat and ball home, leaving the club up sh*t creek?
Let us hope it is the former and then yes if he is good enough he will be there. I f he is the latter then we may as well stop wasteing our time right now!
Then I'm sure Blake will use an injury opportunity or whatever when it comes along. We'll agree to disagree mate, from what I've seen over the years the cream always rises to the top and if they're good enough they always force the guy in front of them out.number8 said:That's not neccesrily true. The theory is sound but the reality of of it doesn't always play out that way. More often than not an injury, off season retirement, or contracted player leaving opens up the opportunity for a kid to break 1st grade. It's what they do after that, puts them ahead of the former!
ParraManiac said:Number 8 it would be if he stormed into the office and told them to f@*% off and tear up his contract.
However if he saw out his contract, gave it his all and couldnt crack it for a spot, because he wasnt given a fair go. Then so be it none of us here could blame him for looking elsewhere.
Bigfella said:He is not entitled to any promises.
He is contracted to the club to be used as they see fit. He has the opportunity to train as hard as he can, and to play as well as he can to impress.
The club would be thoroughly irresponsible to avoid signing a first grade standard half because it might put Blake's nose out of joint.
The guy has not yet forced a single game in first grade, yet people are assuming he should be promised the permanent position for the whole year next year?
No doubt Smith and Finch will get first crack at the halves. Injuries, rep games and all the other permutations will see opportunities for whoever is playing well below. That's how it works. No one gets given guarantees.
i guess it's similar to pj.The Ref in Seat 196 said:True. Blake has to realise that he would be in the same position in any other club. He must play the best he can and give himself every chance to break into first grade. We do need depth in the halves.