NO YOU f**kING DIDNT!! you said it was based on THREE things.
OMG I give up. Do society a favour. Commit suicide. Please
For the love of god.
Page 17 you f**kwit. Go Kill yourself!
As for the crap about 2009, 2010 if we go back over those years like your trying which has been done the dogs were more succesful by 5 years to 3 back to the last title won by either club.
Based on 2011 the dogs were the better team, fact.
Based on who has the last title it goes to the dogs, fact.
Based on who has the last spoon it goes to the roosters, fact.
Based on the additions to the 2012 roster and the losses the dogs are a MILE infront. FACT.
Obviously injuries, form etc all play a huge part year to year. We copped it last couple of years with injuries like every other club has to deal with usually.
Based on the 2011 season, based on the additions to the rosters and coaching staff and losses on before of the roosters it's fair to say they will have a better season AGAIN. I'd also say that is why SO MANY people have the roosters in the bottom 4. Better yet why so many sporting agencies have such low odd's for the dogs to make the 8, and such high odds for the roosters. Also such high odd's for the dogs to collect the spoon and low odd's for the roosters to collect 2 in 4 years.
Next try muppets.
Gee i don't know about you muppets but if your comparing two teams, i'd base it on 3 things. Who had the better LAST season, WHO has the LAST spoon and who has the LAST title. All of them key 3 things are pointing in the dogs favour. The only other thing could be the step the clubs are taking, landing Des Hasler as coach compared to Brian Smith kind of points to the same club. THE DOGS.
Haters gonna hate.