I never said anything of the sort. I challenge you to find a post that backs up your idiotic claim.
You and that nutcase
@mongoose argue we need teams in Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth to increase the amount of people watching the game. Rating patterns suggest a Perth-based team will draw low ratings across the country.
I've seen you argue against NZ2 because the Warriors draw low ratings on Australian TV. You're now saying we shouldn't worry about how many people watch a Perth-based team. It's very hypocritical stance.
You're always talking about the support for Eagles and Dockers being much bigger than the Broncos. Their ratings in Perth are only half the size of the Broncos in Brisbane. If Western Australia's two largest sports teams can only accrue half as many viewers as the Broncos then what chance does an NRL team have of generating a sizeable audience?
There's only three NRL clubs in SEQ you dickhead. It's not about what's best for me. It's about the interests of RL. A third Brisbane team will generate more revenue from game day and provide more value to the broadcasters, increasing the worth of the broadcast rights.
Look at the crap you just posted. You're clearly delusional.