It's the classic rhetorical device of the enemy being weak and strong at the same time, used by ideologues, zealots, despots, and dictators going back millennia.
Very true.
It's the classic rhetorical device of the enemy being weak and strong at the same time, used by ideologues, zealots, despots, and dictators going back millennia.
Well looking at current clubs ideally around 5-6k male jnrs.How many juniors are needed?
Melbourne has 5k. Perth has 4k.
How does the ARLC convince dyed in the wool fumbleball fans to play rugby league?
I would suggest that the civil war and fallout is what held us back for a couple of decades there. But the game is in amazing health at the moment.Player development shouldn't be the responsibility of the NRL sides anyway, and the fact that the sport is still married to such archaic practices is one of the major reasons holding it bad.
I've heard all of the arguments for investing in Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth.He did say it was a fair complaint.
It requires long term investment to do these things and the Storm haven’t concentrated on it (for right or wrong)
Seeing Victorian born and bred players play in the NRL is literally a good thing and with the pathways they now have set up more should come through.
Su’A Faalogo should be an absolute star and he is from Victoria. This is a positive don’t you think?
Nice rantI've heard all of the arguments for investing in Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth.
They're all based on bullshit.
"If we take money away from NSW and Queensland and hand it to Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth to prop up teams they don't want then we'll see a massive growth in players from these markets."
It's a dumb argument because it assumes kids will queue up to play rugby league.
Melbourne have had a team to support for 25 years. It's been more successful on the field than anyone else. The Storm have consumed more money than any club bar Brisbane to fund its success.
What has it produced?
Victoria has 5k juniors and produced 5 NRL players over 25 years.
To put that into perspective, Queensland has produced over 100 AwFuL players.
Does Melbourne have any junior clubs within its inner suburbs?
Most of Victoria's juniors would be descended from Queenslanders, New South Welshmen and Polynesians.
Have any of the five NRL players Victoria has produced come from households that love fumbleball?
Here's the other fact that you, Perth Dread and The Great Dope continue to ignore.
Where's the money for this investment going to come from?
Fumbleball has invested significantly more money in Queensland and NSW than the ARLC has because they've got more revenue.
If we cannot match them on our home turf, what makes you think we can out spend them on their turf?
There is currently 16 players with Victorian lower grade backgrounds playing in the NRL and SL.I've heard all of the arguments for investing in Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth.
They're all based on bullshit.
"If we take money away from NSW and Queensland and hand it to Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth to prop up teams they don't want then we'll see a massive growth in players from these markets."
It's a dumb argument because it assumes kids will queue up to play rugby league.
Melbourne have had a team to support for 25 years. It's been more successful on the field than anyone else. The Storm have consumed more money than any club bar Brisbane to fund its success.
What has it produced?
Victoria has 5k juniors and produced 5 NRL players over 25 years.
To put that into perspective, Queensland has produced over 100 AwFuL players.
Does Melbourne have any junior clubs within its inner suburbs?
Most of Victoria's juniors would be descended from Queenslanders, New South Welshmen and Polynesians.
Have any of the five NRL players Victoria has produced come from households that love fumbleball?
Here's the other fact that you, Perth Dread and The Great Dope continue to ignore.
Where's the money for this investment going to come from?
Fumbleball has invested significantly more money in Queensland and NSW than the ARLC has because they've got more revenue.
If we cannot match them on our home turf, what makes you think we can out spend them on their turf?
This is a classic example of what's called a non sequitur fallacy.
BTW, clubs have received a grant for generations, and the Storm have spent about as much on juniors as any of the other NRL sides on average, it's just that almost all of that spending went outside of Victoria until about 7-8 years ago.
How do you propose the sport grows the numbers of juniors outside of NSW and QLD if it refuses to expand to or invest in those markets at all?
You criticise them for not having enough juniors or supporters, but you are also the one standing in the way of them getting the means to grow their junior and support bases. You can't have it both ways.
Cut spending on Vegas tripsThis is a classic example of a know-it-all changing the subject when presented with questions he cannot answer.
How many Victorian juniors have progressed to the NRL over the last 7-8 years?
Where's the money for this investment going to come from?
AwFuL has a significantly larger sum of money up its sleeve to invest in junior football.
Here's an answer I got using the new Bing, the world’s first AI-powered answer engine. Click to see the full answer and try it yourself. https://sl.bing.net/h0xj0hG7PJAThe **Australian Football League (AFL)** has made significant investments in junior clubs across Queensland to support community growth and enhance facilities. Let's delve into the details:1. **$8 Million Partnership**:
- - In collaboration with the **Queensland Government**, the AFL established an **$8 million partnership** to bolster community AFL facilities in the state. This initiative aims to upgrade infrastructure, particularly benefiting grass-roots clubs like the **Coorparoo AFC**. The funding is part of the legacy from hosting the historic **2020 AFL Grand Final** at the Gabba in Queensland. The AFL matched the Queensland Government’s **Grand Final Infrastructure Legacy** funding dollar for dollar, creating a pipeline of support for community clubs¹.
- - The investment focuses on areas such as female-friendly changerooms, new ovals, upgrades to existing fields, and improved lighting. With a **48% increase in female participation** since 2014, ensuring inclusive facilities is crucial. Good facilities play a pivotal role in attracting and retaining players, especially as AFL pathways now extend from Auskick to the elite game¹.
2. **Additional Community Football Investment**:
- - Beyond the specific partnership, the AFL has committed to community football by enshrining an increased minimum level of annual funding. In **2023**, there will be an immediate injection of **$17 million** into grassroots football, representing a substantial boost from the previous year's investment. This commitment underscores the AFL's dedication to supporting local clubs and nurturing the game at the community level²³.
In summary, the AFL's investments in junior clubs aim to create better facilities, promote inclusivity, and foster the growth of Australian Rules Football in Queensland. Source: Conversation with Bing, 19/12/2023(1) $8m partnership kicks goals for community AFL in Queensland - AFL.com.au. https://www.afl.com.au/news/555326/8-million-partnership-kicks-goals-for-community-aflin-queensland.(2) AFL launches webinar series to help community footy clubs. https://www.aflq.com.au/afl-launches-webinar-series-to-help-community-footy-clubs/.(3) AFL announces major increase in community football investment. https://www.afl.com.au/news/831625/afl-announces-major-increase-in-community-football-investment.(4) Junior & Youth | AFL Queensland. https://www.aflq.com.au/category/junior-youth/.
Compare that with what I got for rugby league in Queensland:
Here's an answer I got using the new Bing, the world’s first AI-powered answer engine. Click to see the full answer and try it yourself. https://sl.bing.net/dcuAnVTMENwThe **Australian Rugby League Commission (ARLC)** has been actively involved in fostering the growth of rugby league in Queensland. Let's explore their recent initiatives:1. **QRL Strategic Framework 2023-2027**:
- - The **Queensland Rugby League (QRL)** recently unveiled its new **Strategic Framework** aimed at future growth and accessibility over the next five years. This framework prioritizes community impact, innovation, accessibility, and pathways and participation.
- - Notably, QRL participation has seen a **4.75% year-on-year increase** in 2022, reaching a total of **64,566 players**, the highest in a decade. Additionally, the QRL extended its commitment to the **RISE Rugby League development program**, benefiting **2066 participants** across specialized player development programs throughout the state¹.
2. **Dolphins Game Development**:
- - The **Dolphins**, a prominent rugby league club, focus on developing volunteers in junior rugby league clubs. Their coach education programs contribute to skilled coaching, leading to greater participation and enjoyment for players².
3. **ARLC's Commitment**:
- - As the custodian of rugby league, the ARLC aims to ensure people of all ages and abilities enjoy playing the game. While specific financial figures for junior clubs in Queensland are not mentioned here, the ARLC's commitment remains strong.
- - With approximately **65,000 rugby league players** across the state participating in **370 clubs** within **447 active competitions**, the ARLC recognizes the need for continued investment to compete effectively against other codes, both male and female¹.
In summary, the ARLC's dedication to community impact, player development, and inclusivity underscores its vital role in shaping rugby league from grassroots to elite levels in Queensland. Source: Conversation with Bing, 19/12/2023(1) Focus on people and growth with launch of QRL Strategic Framework 2023 .... https://www.qrl.com.au/news/2022/12...with-launch-of-strategic-framework-2023-2027/.(2) Development | Dolphins. https://www.dolphinsnrl.com.au/development/.(3) Junior Rugby League Laws. https://www.playrugbyleague.com/media/4109/national_8-12_booklet.pdf.
Notice how the Dolphins are doing much of the work?
Brisbane Tigers are needed to do the same in southern Brisbane. There's no way the News Ltd Broncos will ever invest in junior rugby league. News Ltd is too busy investing in fumbleball. Rupert Murdoch told us this at an AwFuL press conference.
Well looking at current clubs ideally around 5-6k male jnrs.
Those numbers are made up of jnrs, snrs and womens in WA and Vic.
After that it is quality of coaching and pathways. Investing in improving jnr coaching skills would be a big help in these emerging states.
How? More development officers, more promotion, supporting more schools programs, getting the game on main channel of fta, promotion of game, getting game in local media regularly, Chairman not calling expansion states a waste of money, working with state govt for improved funding and facilities, increased spending on the league stars program and so it goes on......
There's 1million U15's in Victoria. Only around 60k of them play AFL. So its not about converting AFl fans to RL. Its finding the kids that prefer a tougher game, or are too big to play AFL effectively.
Ive told you, its not rocket science. Investment in = players out. You yourself have agreed with this when it comes to AFL in Queensland.How do you propose the game gets more boys to play rugby league in cities that don't give a f**k about the game?
Dolphins are doing this right now.
Why don't you phone up the Melbourne Storm and tell them to do the same in Victoria?
You're good at telling everyone what to do.
You're quite dumb if you think it's a matter of getting the game broadcast on the main channel.
AwFuL is broadcast into Brisbane and Sydney on 7mate.
It hasn't hurt their junior numbers, has it?
Haven't you spent the last 12-24 months telling us AwFuL have hundreds of millions of extra revenue to spend?
How do you propose the ARLC match AwFuL's investment when it doesn't have the money?
Don't weasel your way out by saying the money is already there -- I've seen you do this before. You've argued in the media forum that fumbleball has a significantly higher revenue stream that they can use to fund four expansion clubs in the northern states. You've also said the only way our game can overcome this gap is by putting unwanted teams in Adelaide and Perth.
Now you're telling us there's no gap and we can afford to do what fumbleball does in Brisbane and Sydney?
They've had 25 years to do that. Failed miserably.
I've heard all of the arguments for investing in Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth.
They're all based on bullshit.
"If we take money away from NSW and Queensland and hand it to Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth to prop up teams they don't want then we'll see a massive growth in players from these markets."
It's a dumb argument because it assumes kids will queue up to play rugby league.
Melbourne have had a team to support for 25 years. It's been more successful on the field than anyone else. The Storm have consumed more money than any club bar Brisbane to fund its success.
What has it produced?
Victoria has 5k juniors and produced 5 NRL players over 25 years.
To put that into perspective, Queensland has produced over 100 AwFuL players.
Does Melbourne have any junior clubs within its inner suburbs?
Most of Victoria's juniors would be descended from Queenslanders, New South Welshmen and Polynesians.
Have any of the five NRL players Victoria has produced come from households that love fumbleball?
Here's the other fact that you, Perth Dread and The Great Dope continue to ignore.
Where's the money for this investment going to come from?
Fumbleball has invested significantly more money in Queensland and NSW than the ARLC has because they've got more revenue.
If we cannot match them on our home turf, what makes you think we can out spend them on their turf?
Firstly who are you quoting?
Secondly what do you propose?
You can whinge about the fact that only QLD and NSW produce players or you do something about it. You can whinge about the fact that Queensland have produced 100 Awful players and we haven’t produced as many or again you do something about it.
It’s essentially emblematic of a massive inferiority complex that this game and its supporters have that is frankly very frustrating. The fumblers are only in the position they are (revenue wise included) because they took the time to invest in something and made hard decisions (by the way they are still pedestrian by global standards) Just do the hard work, take some risks and have a long term strategy. You can’t growth anything - business/personal fortune (whatever) without taking risks.
I have an inferiority complex because I think Brisbane, NZ and PNG have more to offer than Adelaide and Perth?
Great post. Sadly it will be lost on that dullard.Well you are snookering yourself a little with PNG but I’ll leave that one for another time.
No you have an inferiority complex because you think the game can’t grow beyond anything that it currently is, whereas fumbleball can and has. Do you think fumbleball was producing players or had much popularity in Queensland thirty or forty years ago?
The other point about fumbleball having more revenue therefore we can’t do anything is frankly absurd.
Firstly, it hasn’t stopped any other sport. Most sports produce athletes from around the country. They don’t go oh well fumbleball is really popular in Victoria we should just give up then.
Secondly, fumbleball didn’t have this revenue before they went into Sydney and Brisbane they made it after they went into those areas - they didn’t have $900 million odd revenue 35 years ago. The way you and some others talk you’d think that the game is destitute and fumbleball have European soccer type money. Take a risk and grow a new audience.
Thirdly, find your niche. We produce vastly different types of athletes to fumbleball. We are never going to have the same amount of junior participants compared to that sport because the physicality of our sport is greater. Nevertheless, bigger bodies aren’t suited to their game but may be suited to ours. Not everybody in Victoria etc is a stick insect.
Well you are snookering yourself a little with PNG but I’ll leave that one for another time.
No you have an inferiority complex because you think the game can’t grow beyond anything that it currently is, whereas fumbleball can and has.
Do you think fumbleball was producing players or had much popularity in Queensland thirty or forty years ago?
The other point about fumbleball having more revenue therefore we can’t do anything is frankly absurd.
Firstly, it hasn’t stopped any other sport. Most sports produce athletes from around the country. They don’t go oh well fumbleball is really popular in Victoria we should just give up then.
Secondly, fumbleball didn’t have this revenue before they went into Sydney and Brisbane they made it after they went into those areas - they didn’t have $900 million odd revenue 35 years ago. The way you and some others talk you’d think that the game is destitute and fumbleball have European soccer type money. Take a risk and grow a new audience.
Thirdly, find your niche. We produce vastly different types of athletes to fumbleball. We are never going to have the same amount of junior participants compared to that sport because the physicality of our sport is greater. Nevertheless, bigger bodies aren’t suited to their game but may be suited to ours. Not everybody in Victoria etc is a stick insect.
There's no guarantee that adding teams to Adelaide and Perth will lead to our game generating more revenue. You've failed to provide any evidence that the broadcasters and sponsors will pay more for an NRL that has teams in Adelaide and Perth.He can’t see past sydney and Brisbane. He’s only championing brisbane3 as he didn’t get Logan in as Brisbane2
. He’s spent years championing Perth but because I’ve gone against brisbane 3 he now hates on perth.
he bemoans that nrl doesn’t have the revenue afl has, yet wants to continue perpetuating the circumstances that have led to this gap. It’s a very bizarre world inside his head lol
Nice rant, again lolThere's no guarantee that adding teams to Adelaide and Perth will lead to our game generating more revenue. You've failed to provide any evidence that the broadcasters and sponsors will pay more for an NRL that has teams in Adelaide and Perth.
NBL, BBL and A-League have a presence in all metro area, yet they don't generate as much revenue as the NRL!
This is where you say "that's because they're minor sports!"
Guess what motherf**ker, cricket is Australia's only national sport and is played and watched avidly around the entire country!
In 2019, the Sydney Sixers had a budget of $12.5m. Hobart Hurricanes had a budget of $8.5m.
That f**ks up your bullshit theory and proves you're full of shit.
You're against everyone that isn't Perth because you're an obnoxious wanker with an entitlement complex. A few weeks ago you ranted about how much you hate the Dolphins for using red, black and gold in their away jersey. According to you those colours must be reserved for a Perth-based team.
Single factor analysis are always braindead and there will be consequences for PVL's short term boosting tactics. Besides the 'amazing health' of the game is all surface level and restricted to the NRL. The grassroots are in the worst shape they've ever been in broadly speaking and no amount of fancy statistical manipulation can change that.I would suggest that the civil war and fallout is what held us back for a couple of decades there. But the game is in amazing health at the moment.
Depends on what sort of investment we're talking about, but the NRL more than has the means necessary to invest in basics like full time development officers, equipment, infrastructure, training programs, promotional material, professional administrations, etc, etc. NRL sides in Perth and Adelaide would relatively quickly pay for themselves in increased advertising, sponsorship, and broadcast value alone, assuming they were competently run of course.Where's the money for this investment going to come from?