Brisbane Tigers make their bid to be 18th team

[Perth Red]

Cause you are being a dope and you know it

when the rights go to market then we will see their worth

I would suggest the dolphins are worth more than tasmania the suns and gws combined to networks

$115mill without brisbane 2, $115mill with Brisbane2. Ergo Ch9 did not value another Brisbane club. Its really not hard to understand what happened!

By your own admission you are saying location wont matter and that competition from going to open market is what matters. Thanks for clarifying that!

You can suggest what you like but until Tv actually pony's up the money its just your opinion! Tv paid up for AFL expansion , hasnt yet for NRL so your point is, well kind of pointless.

 

[Pippen94]

$115mill without brisbane 2, $115mill with Brisbane2. Ergo Ch9 did not value another Brisbane club. Its really not hard to understand what happened!

By your own admission you are saying location wont matter and that competition from going to open market is what matters. Thanks for clarifying that!

You can suggest what you like but until Tv actually pony's up the money its just your opinion! Tv paid up for AFL expansion , hasnt yet for NRL so your point is, well kind of pointless.

Lol, nine said the more south east qld games the better. Cc me when they say the more western Australian games the better..

 

[Perth Red]

Lol, nine said the more south east qld games the better. Cc me when they say the more western Australian games the better..

Show me where they've put their money where their mouth is?
$115mill pre Brisbane2 - $115mill with Brisbane2
Yeh they value it so much lol

 

[Pippen94]

Show me where they've put their money where their mouth is?

They probably fund expansion team like fox did for dolphins

 

[Perth Red]

They probably fund expansion team like fox did for dolphins

Probably, lol

 

[Pippen94]

Probably, lol

Yeah, article where wwos saying they want to grow game through qld probably meant Perth..

 

[Perth Red]

Yeah, article where wwos saying they want to grow game through qld probably meant Perth..

yeh it probably meant, despite evidence to the contrary, they are going to pay for it as well lol

 

[Pippen94]

yeh it probably meant, despite evidence to the contrary, they are going to pay for it as well lol

Well fox paid for dolphins. Remind me did they pay for Perth too?!

 

[Wb1234]

$115mill without brisbane 2, $115mill with Brisbane2. Ergo Ch9 did not value another Brisbane club. Its really not hard to understand what happened!

By your own admission you are saying location wont matter and that competition from going to open market is what matters. Thanks for clarifying that!

You can suggest what you like but until Tv actually pony's up the money its just your opinion! Tv paid up for AFL expansion , hasnt yet for NRL so your point is, well kind of pointless.

This is a good example of why these forums are so crap

 

[Perth Red]

Well fox paid for dolphins. Remind me did they pay for Perth too?!

did they really though?

2017 Tv deal $385mill
2023 Tv deal $400mill ($12mill from SkyNZ+$5mill contra from Ch9)
Hmmm

 

[Pippen94]

did they really though?

2017 Tv deal $385mill
2023 Tv deal $400mill ($12mill from SkyNZ+$5mill contra from Ch9)
Hmmm

Yeah, they totally covered cost of expansion. Now nine saying the more se qld content the better..but why quote what broadcasters say when u can speak for them instead?!

 

[Perth Red]

This is a good example of why these forums are so crap

Haha why because you cant form a logical argument?

By your own admission AFL added two teams in TV undesirable locations and got a sizeable uplift in the tv deal, then they added (maybe) another club in a seemingly undesirable tv location and got a massive uplift in tv deal.

So which is it? Content amount, competition for rights or location that matters? Because looking at AFL, and by your own argument, location doesnt matter to TV $ increase.

 

[Perth Red]

Yeah, they totally covered cost of expansion. Now nine saying the more se qld content the better..but why quote what broadcasters say when u can speak for them instead?!

Actions speak louder than words. Ch9 paid nothing for more SEQ content in this tv deal. But yeh it will be different next time, because...........?

 

[Wb1234]

Haha why because you cant from a logical argument?

By your own admission AFL added two teams in TV undesirable locations and got a sizeable uplift in the tv deal, then they added (maybe) another club in a seemingly undesirable tv loaction and got a massive uplift in tv deal.

So which is it? Content amount, competition for rights or location that matters? Because looking at AFL, and by your own argument, location doesnt matter to TV $ increase.

Stop being childish

when I talk rugby league to normal human beings in real life they are nothing like the expansion and tv forums

a lot of you guys come up with the dumbest arguments just for the sake of bs

 

[Perth Red]

Stop being childish

when I talk rugby league to normal human beings in real life they are nothing like the expansion and tv forums

a lot of you guys come up with the dumbest arguments just for the sake of bs

You are the one that put the argument forward that AFLs three expansion sides have less value to TV than Dolphins? Yet the Tv $'s wouldn't say so would it? So is it location what matters or other things? Because you seem to be arguing that AFL got more money despite adding dud clubs?

 

[Wb1234]

You are the one that put the argument forward that AFLs three expansion sides have less value to TV than Dolphins? Yet the Tv $'s wouldn't say so would it? So is it location what matters or other things? Because you seem to be arguing that AFL got more money despite adding dud clubs?

The nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

 

[Pippen94]

Actions speak louder than words. Ch9 paid nothing for more SEQ content in this tv deal. But yeh it will be different next time, because...........?

Because they asking for it & expansion won't happen unless broadcasters come to party like last time

 

[Perth Red]

The nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

the nrl hasn’t gone to market yet

So what you are arguing is that Tv revenue increase is in open market competition, not in new club location?

 

[Perth Red]

Because they asking for it & expansion won't happen unless broadcasters come to party like last time

Funny I could have sworn Ch9 boss had been telling us for years how valuable another team in Brisbane would be to Ch9? Then when push came to shove, nothing.

Does this sound familiar lol?
2015-
Gyngell declined to discuss the soon-to-be-secured broadcasting deal due to confidentiality. But the 49-year-old, an ardent Roosters fan, believes Queensland has the demographic and corporate strength to support a fourth Queensland club.
“I can’t see how there isn’t room for another team in Brisbane,” Gyngell told The Sunday Mail.
Queensland is the heart and soul of rugby league as far as I’m concerned and it needs more product which helps broadcasting.

 

[Pippen94]

Funny I could have sworn Ch9 boss had been telling us for years how valuable another team in Brisbane would be to Ch9? Then when push came to shove, nothing.

Does this sound familiar lol?
2015-
Gyngell declined to discuss the soon-to-be-secured broadcasting deal due to confidentiality. But the 49-year-old, an ardent Roosters fan, believes Queensland has the demographic and corporate strength to support a fourth Queensland club.
“I can’t see how there isn’t room for another team in Brisbane,” Gyngell told The Sunday Mail.
Queensland is the heart and soul of rugby league as far as I’m concerned and it needs more product which helps broadcasting.

..yeah & fox footed bill. Expansion won't happen without broadcasters paying up. Don't hear them talking about Perth lol