The issue at hand? You mean rumours from a notoriously hysterical tabloid newspaper?
The issue at hand - the quote of mine you replied to - was about Kearney's lack of game plans. Nothing about DA, and nothing about tabloid newspapers....
How about waiting for official word from the club? And no, they shouldn't respond to every rumour that appears in the news. The first law of public relations is that no comment is the best comment to make in 99% of cases.
I have no idea what you're going on about here... word, rumours, comment? This is an internet forum, and people are discussing the merits of whether Sandow should be dropped or not. Waiting for official word before having any discussions about anything, reeks of seeking a clinically loyal environment where the authority has the final only say, and everyone then needs to fall in line behind the "official word" - my country right or wrong, you could say? Much better imo not to get so upset about the exchange of opinions and independent thinking.
The team knows whether Sandow will play on Sunday. Thanks to all this bullshit the Tigers do not. Who do you think that benefits?
All this bullshit (presuming you're referring to rumours in papers here?) benefits no-one actually. It can only serve to destabilise the mentally weaker members of our squad, who (understandably, for the younger ones) may not have the self-discipline to not read the press or facebook, twitter etc. It can destabilise even the senior players who get asked questions by the press about all of this (Hindy on TV last night, Poore and Maitua during the week in the press).
The "talk" of dropping Sandow in the media is hardly the coaching masterstroke to create uncertainty for the Tigers that you are trying to make out. Now back to those game plans, mentioned in the part of my post that you quoted....?