Because some of our fan base are obsessed with it not being given to Hornby or Young & because Flanagan is apparently on the nose with Doust.
I appreciate that there are concerns for a rookie coach and the link between Young and the Board and the abhorrent past 10 seasons. But we went with an experienced coach in Griffin and the majority of this forum sung his praises and look how that turned out.
Is Flanagan the answer? He has won a premiership, but he hasn't coached in 6 years and was bypassed by multiple clubs, and was also an assistant under Mary and part of the refusal to drop Corey Norman.
I personally have no problem with any of the options, but unfortunately, we need a coach as much as we do a mediator with the board. At the very least Hornby and Young know the board and the intricacies and may have the nous to deal with them, because my concern is Flanagan, like Ryles will want widespread changes (validly) and they may not happen. Does he crack the shits and move on halfway through his contract?
The worst part of this all is that no matter who the coach is, they need to be able to coach the team and mediate with the Board, who for better or worse, aren't going anywhere.
All true indeed - but .... the Griffin debacle (and McG and Price before him) demonstrates that nobody has a crystal ball. All recruitment is a judgment call. Past experience is a key selection criterion but, objectively, so is our past experience of rat shit selections. I think this time we may be wise to go with someone who already feels a little uncomfortable. We
really need a person who will challenge the status quo - and even the incumbents in director and management roles need to wake-up to themselves and accept this fact. It's the incumbents who need to show some guts, not just handball the challenge to a new fall guy.
Hornby and Young played for the club - back when it was last successful - when Bennett was the coach. And, what was Bennett's defining criterion? that the Board and management
must stay away from the footy. You don't employ experts and then tell them how to do their job. Only arrogant egomaniacs would do that (d'oh).
I doubt either Hornby or Young will have the authority to 'mediate' with the board. In any case, mediation isn't required - the board need to be told to get out of the room and stay out. Go and do your jobs and leave the footy to the experts.
If Young is given the job let's face it - it will be perceived as unadulterated nepotism (rightly IMO) - which is an absolute open-door for the interfering mongrels. IMO, Young would be just about the worst possible appointment.
I think Hornby is an excellent assistant coach (quite possibly the best attacking coach in the game right now) but I think he'd be absolutely crazy to take on Saints as they are at present. It is more likely to end his career rather than launch it.