R&WTILLIDIE
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,696
Hang on…he ran 5kms…doesn’t necessarily mean he broke the line.Hearld reporting Dufty ran five kms home when the police arrived.
He's racking up line breaks even on his day off. Re-sign him now.
Hang on…he ran 5kms…doesn’t necessarily mean he broke the line.Hearld reporting Dufty ran five kms home when the police arrived.
He's racking up line breaks even on his day off. Re-sign him now.
I think the whole thing is ridiculous, reactions included. To suggest this could have ended the competition is laughable, especially when you consider what the Bulldogs guys did. They're the ones who actually broke the precious bubble.Hahahaha what? You’re just looking for a fight? So based off what you’re saying (and thanks for correcting me) what the players did was still breaking the law.
On NRL 360 it seemed like Hadley, Hooper and Kent were in a competition to see who was the most personally outraged and offended by the (admittedly stupid) actions of the Dragons players. The players have been caught, punished and subject to further investigation. Give it a rest, move on and try to salvage something from this season.
Now the mole us saying a player made a statement on the issue.
He was one that was not there.
Is this gutter journalism again .
What player would actually say it to a reporter.
In my opinion the mole is bullshitting trying to stir up more trouble.
Yep I get that you are standing from a normal work practice environment, and definitely not condoning their actions.Having a sexual affair is not necessarily a work related matter unless it happened in the work place, with a work colleague, was conducted using work resources, or was the subject of judicial proceedings. As it was neither of the first three, and the judicial gave no definitive result, it is not applicable.
With Vaughan, we do not know the exact circumstances. However for him to have been fined there would have had to be an internal investigation, it would have had to involve happening during work time, in the workplace, or with a work colleague, and Vaughan would have had to have his own representation and be able to tell his side of events for it to hold up under legal due process requirements under industrial law.
Please note, I'm not trying to condone what either JDB of Vaughan did (or didn't do), just explaining the legal aspects as I see them.
That is why, in my opinion, they are not comparable as the circumstances are different.
Ryan Webb has made a positive impact in his time as CEO - however in his interview regarding the Paul Vaughan affair he states that he doesn’t think the Dragons have a culture problem!!!
That’s the start of the problem right there!
Not acknowledging a problem is a sure way of not addressing it!
Sorry Mr Webb – there very clearly is a culture problem at the Dragons!
However, you are not the only club with that problem!
We need to seriously look at values across all clubs, particularly values regarding responsibility, reliability and integrity!
And as with all integrity and trust issues, you have to walk the walk, as well as talk the talk!
Clear standards, well explained, widely promoted and modelled, and consistently expected and applied is what is required!
The Mole is a known bullshit artist and that's a fact of life...always trying to jag a headline...journalism 101 always says a statement without a name is not a statement..its bullshit...there's no way any current player would say anythingNow the mole us saying a player made a statement on the issue.
He was one that was not there.
Is this gutter journalism again .
What player would actually say it to a reporter.
In my opinion the mole is bullshitting trying to stir up more trouble.
I certainly would not put it past the hairy little bastard .