F.O Kemp Society inc

[wittyfan]

Kemp's kicking skills are on a par with Becks' tbh.

 

[lockyno1]

Kemp can bend it like Becks

 

[Rich102]

Kemp's kicking skills are on a par with Becks' tbh.

So are his tackling skills!

 

[lockyno1]

Kempy rooted by the video ref though, fair dinkum they look at ways to NOT give tries these days!

 

[lockyno1]

Kempy scored 1, he played well today.

As for Ropati, he sure knows how to let tries in doesn't he!

 

[Martli]

but The Only Pressure He Really Feels Is From The Social Media. One Columnist Has Declared Kemp And Girlfriend Hayley Mundy To Be Auckland's Own David And Victoria Beckham. "we Like That Kind Of [social] Stuff But We Don't Really Like The `posh And Becks' Stuff," He Says.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/league/2418049/stacey-won-t-ask-for-new-contract

Dead. F**king. Set

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

 

[Rich102]

I don't care that he scored a try my mother-in-law could have scored. His defence is pathetic.
Whoever signed him should be sacked!

 

[NZ Warrior]

I don't care that he scored a try my mother-in-law could have scored. His defence is pathetic.
Whoever signed him should be sacked!

Or maybe Jerome Ropati is his defensive coach.

 

[lockyno1]

Ropati was 100 times worse in defence

 

[Lego_Man]

Kemp didnt make any f**kups in defence that i noticed, in fact i thought he made a couple of really good ball-and-all tackles.

 

[lockyno1]

Exactly and he would have had 2 tries if it wasn't for Steve Clark MKII in the video box..I thought you had to be CERTAIN to disallow a try..what on earth has changed!

 

[Liam]

Putting Moon back inside Kemp is going to do wonders for your attack.

 

[Rich102]

Exactly and he would have had 2 tries if it wasn't for Steve Clark MKII in the video box..I thought you had to be CERTAIN to disallow a try..what on earth has changed!

Which try are you referring to? The first one he was clearly offside and dropped the ball. The other he was out. I have no argument with those decisions.

 

[lockyno1]

Which try are you referring to? The first one he was clearly offside and dropped the ball. The other he was out. I have no argument with those decisions.

The "offside" one. He looked fairly close to in line and he got more downward pressure than Winderstein did and his try was given. One replay showed he was offside, one showed he was onside. Benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking player. The other one he was in touch, no dramas there.

 

[KeepingTheFaith]

The "offside" one. He looked fairly close to in line and he got more downward pressure than Winderstein did and his try was given. One replay showed he was offside, one showed he was onside. Benefit of the doubt goes to the attacking player. The other one he was in touch, no dramas there.

They didn't show more than one replay, they showed the same replay twice.

Clearly off side, clearly no downward pressure.

 

[lockyno1]

Well the 2nd time they showed it, he was marginal. Those ones are a classic benefit of the doubt. Look I hate the "downward pressure rule" as I like the old you put the damn thing down with your hands. But it was no worse than Winderstein's effort from my team 9Brisbane)

 

[wittyfan]

Kempy will be back!!!

 

[Rich102]

Had he gone somewhere?

 

[wittyfan]

The New Becks & Posh and someone else:

 

[Martli]

f**k I crack up every time I see barbie and ken. I just love it how "posh and becks" are an average as NRL player and, well, a nobody.