Chins get the wins
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,027
Stay in your comfortable bubbleYou have no proof for your claims do you Chins about the royal family being pedophiles.
Stay in your comfortable bubbleYou have no proof for your claims do you Chins about the royal family being pedophiles.
That is disciplining his kid.Dont forget thisView attachment 78704
Stay in your comfortable bubble
No I've had many accounts banned by providing factsProve your claims or withdraw them Chins. Your choice.
No I've had many accounts banned by providing facts
I will say this one more time, that could be classified as sodomy. Clearly Hopgood took offense, hence the lashing out. Also this was his second time he did that.The whoLe sexual assault narrative is or was silly.
Certainly, not something you want to see regardless of whether it is banter between two former team mates, not sure how that fits around the same act against Garrick, but just no more stupidity .
Hopgood lashed out with his legs.Im not getting into specifics of bum pokes but the eye test alone should say enough. So too the fact that neither player has complained or reacted aggressively.
By poking, attempting, to poke someone in the arse, twice to two different people, is ATTEMPTED sodomizing. SimpleGee folks are using words here they have no idea about.
Do you honestly think if Luke sodimized Hoogood, there would have been only a warning letter.
There would have been criminal charges laid too.
I would suggest that the video evidence is inconclusive at best. Especially when you realise that there are mutiple cameras used during the game.
Luke would have been brought in front of the MRC as a beginning point. That did not happen.
So claiming that Hopgood was being 'sodimized' is borderline hysteria.
(Note well: This does NOT mean I approve of what Luke did.)
Hopgood lashed out with his legs.
By poking, attempting, to poke someone in the arse, twice to two different people, is ATTEMPTED sodomizing. Simple
I am pretty fired up about this.Players lash out with their legs in most tackles. That means nothing. If he had been poked in the bum, he would have made a compliant.
That's not what you said Jane.
Refer to my first paragraph. I believe your clutching at straws.
I am pretty fired up about this. My God get a grip and stop living in fantasy land.
No idea. The visual image is there, clearly not conclusive, however, they did send a letter of concern.If that's the case, why didn't the MRC charge him ?
The reason.....Lack of evidence.
No idea. The visual image is there, clearly not conclusive, however, they did send a letter of concern.
Now I'm done.
The correct spelling is sodomy. It looked that way. It is a poor reflection. Simple.You have said the major word.....'not conclusive'.....the MRC didn't charge him, because the various camera angles show that the act couldn't be proven.
Also explains why you can't accuse Luke of 'sodmey' either.
Check out the Jimmy Saville doco, let me know what you think then.Because they're not based on fact.
Rumour, gossip and innuendo 'doth butter no pasnips' Chins.
Chinese whispers are nothing more than a children's game played at birthday parties.
I'm in the outraged camp, but Sodomy is a stretch.The correct spelling is sodomy. It looked that way. It is a poor reflection. Simple.
Look up the meaning of sodomy and get back to me. It appears to be attempted sodomy.I'm in the outraged camp, but Sodomy is a stretch.
I know what it means. Anal or oral intercourse is the definition. Like I said, a bit of a stretch.Look up the meaning of sodomy and get back to me. It appears to be attempted sodomy.