bottle
Coach
- Messages
- 14,126
Who made this assertion?
I've rarely seen someone exaggerate so much in an attempt to make their point.
GKD did.
Or if he didn't, he meant to.
Who made this assertion?
I've rarely seen someone exaggerate so much in an attempt to make their point.
Oobjectively speaking, GKD has reeled in a record sized Marlin on a frozen prawn.
Can't wait to see the pics.
So now it's just Lolz just trolling
Right.
So that's why you don't like NFL...
You are too dumb.
You claim that it's a fact that it's a better sport, it's not a fact it's just one arseholes opinion.
To pretend that 3 nerds posting in the sub forum of a League website is representative of the sports is grasping at best.
Why the f**k are you even a member here when clearly you don't like the game?
Do we then divide those averages to represent the population numbers? Or won't we do that.
Bullshit, have a look at this thread. 95% of all posts are pro NFL and over exaggerate their skill sets and intelligence to ridiculous extremes.
It even makes massive Union fans like you seem unbiased.
I don't know that all the players are so smart. Point is, nearly all have been to college and most have completed tertiary education. It is a great system - might not be so important for the stars of the NFL - but it is a big deal for the many more that tried and didn't make it. Nice to have a system for pro sport selection that all but guarantees you a degree to fall back on.
More young aussies should take a shot - make a college team and you can come out of it with a degree and a chance at a pro sport career in the NFL.
Its an extremely smart system. So many young sportsman will not make it.
Im pretty sure most U20's if not all are studying towards a degree or a trade.
I don't know about any figures but I don't think it will be very high.I would be interested in the number of NFL players that get drafted that have actually completed their degree.
Do you know the figure?
I love my NFL and have for 30 years...
Didn't know the players were so smart though...
The ones that have 10 kids to 8 different women must be the exceptions that prove the rule...
Nationwide, football players average 220 points lower on the SAT than their classmates ? and men?s basketball players average seven points less than football players.
Those figures come from an Atlanta Journal-Constitution study of 54 public universities, including the members of the six major Bowl Championship Series conferences and other schools whose teams finished the 2007-08 season ranked among the football or men?s basketball top 25.
While it?s commonly known that admission standards are different for athletes, the AJC study quantifies how wide the gap is between athletes and the general student body at major universities.
Georgia Tech?s football players had the nation?s best average SAT score, 1028 of a possible 1600, and best average high school GPA, 3.39 of a possible 4.0 in the core curriculum. But Tech?s football players still scored 315 SAT points lower on average than their classmates.
At the University of Georgia, the average football SAT was 949, which is 239 points behind the average for an undergraduate student at Georgia ? and 79 points behind Tech?s football average. The Bulldogs? average high school GPA was 2.77, or 45th out of 53 teams for which football GPAs were available. Their SAT average ranked them 22nd.
Nationwide, coaches who would never offer a scholarship to a player who was 6 inches shorter or half a second slower than other prospects routinely recruit players whose standardized test scores suggest they?re at a competitive disadvantage in the classroom.
It?s the price of winning.
?If you?re going to mount a competitive program in Division I-A, and our institution is committed to do that, some flexibility in admissions of athletes is going to take place,? said Tom Lifka, chairman of the committee that handles athlete admissions at the University of California, Los Angeles. ?Every institution I know in the country operates in the same way. It may or may not be a good thing, but that?s the way it is.?
UCLA, which has won more NCAA championships in all sports than any other school, had the biggest gap between the average SAT scores of athletes in all sports and its overall student body, at 247 points. ?
No reason they can't be. The Eels and Panthers could do a deal with UWS and make success at the course part of the requirements for ongoing involvement in the junior squads. Ideally each uni in the country would field a team and make qualifications part of that requirement - this would mirror the great system in the USA.
But we could have a hybrid that would work and would produce better men, not just better footballers.
The deal for club rugby players at Sydney Uni is the only one I've heard of that comes close. It's not a deal for every player, and it creates an uneven comp as rival teams just can't make that offer as they aren't linked to a uni. The best way forward might be for Eastwood to link with Macquarie Uni and Penrith & Two Blues to link with UWS and so on.
because the working man is stupid. If they were smart they wouldn't be working.