What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hoppa

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,027
Competing non-fictional accounts don't invalidate each other Gronk. What kind of head-in-the-sand logic is that?

Who gives a f**k about wishy washy philosophical smoke screens ? You can bring your book and the others theirs and you can punch it out. Last man standing means that your book is the best. I'll be the merkin munching on popcorn in row E.

gladiator3a-0018.jpg
 

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
63,437
Who gives a f**k about wishy washy philosophical smoke screens ? You can bring your book and the others theirs and you can punch it out. Last man standing means that your book is the best. I'll be the merkin munching on popcorn in row E.

gladiator3a-0018.jpg



could be worse-we could be talking politics
 

SDM

First Grade
Messages
7,600
Nothing worse than dickheads who try to push religion (or lack there of) and political crap. lol @ gronk, what a flogger.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,340
Who gives a f**k about wishy washy philosophical smoke screens ? You can bring your book and the others theirs and you can punch it out. Last man standing means that your book is the best. I'll be the merkin munching on popcorn in row E.

Always the focus on books with you people. Try and think outside the box, Gronk.

The map is not the territory.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,027
Always the focus on books with you people. Try and think outside the box, Gronk.

The map is not the territory.

Ok so I've thought outside the box and decided that the truth lies with Tripitaka and her disciples Monkey, Pigsy and Sandie.

monkey_magic%5B1%5D.JPG
 

oldmancraigy

Coach
Messages
11,978
Competing non-fictional accounts don't invalidate each other Gronk. What kind of head-in-the-sand logic is that?

Dont they all make a unique claim to the truth? Only 1 of them could be non fiction in that case.

I think it is far more likely that Gronk has the inside running on universal truth than some first century bloke who is revered by billions, and whom any historian worth his salt acknowledges was real and did some extraordinary stuff....
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,027
Dont they all make a unique claim to the truth? Only 1 of them could be non fiction in that case.

I think it is far more likely that Gronk has the inside running on universal truth than some first century bloke who is revered by billions, and whom any historian worth his salt acknowledges was real and did some extraordinary stuff....


That Criss Angel bloke does some freaky shit too.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,340
Dont they all make a unique claim to the truth? Only 1 of them could be non fiction in that case.

They obviously each have a claim to at least some of the truth, but that doesn't necessarily mean they have a unique claim to the truth, either whole or in part.

It is also folly to think anyone would be expected to trust what they read or hear while denying the rest of their senses. Everybody chooses every day what to believe and what isn't trustworthy. Priests, politicians, scientists.. people are naturally sceptical of those who claim to know what we should think. This is how we come to our beliefs.

But as history shows us, it's very possible for most people to be wrong. Even then, why should we believe what we're told about history?
 

oldmancraigy

Coach
Messages
11,978
They obviously each have a claim to at least some of the truth, but that doesn't necessarily mean they have a unique claim to the truth, either whole or in part.

It is also folly to think anyone would be expected to trust what they read or hear while denying the rest of their senses. Everybody chooses every day what to believe and what isn't trustworthy. Priests, politicians, scientists.. people are naturally sceptical of those who claim to know what we should think. This is how we come to our beliefs.

But as history shows us, it's very possible for most people to be wrong. Even then, why should we believe what we're told about history?

Sorry Pou, postmodernism is dead.

Most people recognise it was stupid and theoretical and completely devoid of reality. Worldviews are swinging back towards the modernistic
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,340
Sorry Pou, postmodernism is dead.

Most people recognise it was stupid and theoretical and completely devoid of reality. Worldviews are swinging back towards the modernistic

These are just labels mate. They are useful for description of the abstract and the general, but little else.
 

Latest posts

Top