The sign of a good coach is a good following year regardless of replacement. Is Bluey that bad or left a poor devided squad that over achieved on some individual briallance.Bad roster ok performances-Cleary can coach look at the warriors this year compared to last....
The sign of a good coach is a good following year regardless of replacement. Is Bluey that bad or left a poor devided squad that over achieved on some individual briallance.
Anyways....
Plenty of time to see.
I thought we looked pretty good in attack today, bit unlucky really
Defense was terrible though
I'm not fine with 2015.
I'm fine with winning a comp in 2015.
I know we'll be competitive if we stay healthy in 2013 enough to make the 8. Then make an assault on the comp in 2014/15
To me that highlights how in-effective our back rowers are. Our outside backs seem to be to push away from tacklers but don't get to back up a line breaking back rower.We are 1st in passes thrown. 5th in linebreaks. Yet last with 2.9 tries scored a game. At some stage you need to look at why we aren't captalising on those chances & make the required changes. We had enough decent chances to be up 18-0 early on & didn't take them.
Our outside backs seem to be to push away from tacklers but don't get to back up a line breaking back rower.
The worry is the business itself. Not really looking forward to seeing the annual report for 2011-12 but it will be interesting.
Gould has almost no power over the team, unless he is required to step in. His job is the business side of things, particulally revolving around the leagues club and its interaction.What worries me with Penrith is Gould is a real power figure and will want the footballing side of things like he wants and that may not sit that well with Cleary's coaching and Cleary's regime for the club.
Michael Gordon has played something like 10 games in 3 years(??). Penrith offered him a contract, a fair amount of money considering he was being paid for being injured for most of his previous contract. He was offered a bigger offer elsewhere. Gus advised Mick that if the offer is there, take it. I applaud this decision. I applaud Penrith for not paying over what they were comfortable with, and what they budgeted what he was worth. There is no more in this, Penrith were just not comfortable paying over what they believe he is worth, in their eyes. This is something the old administration would not have done.For the record offloading Mick Gordon was a mistake, The one strength of your spine you just let go after a bad run of injuries, I don't get it in my opinion. Who is on the market that you can replace him with?.
Matt Moylan, James Roberts, Wes Naiqama, Josh Mansour, Dean Whare. Not a problem.Coote looks set for a full time transition to six so who will play Fullback?, You simply cannot throw a rookie there next year in a weakend spine?
First of, Coote played 5/8 in the juniors, so not completely new to the position. I will reserve my judgement on Walsh until the end of next year. IMO having Coote at 6 will help his game after an off-season together. Segeyaro is also on his way and will play ~35min a game if he is the bench hooker, of ~45min if he is the starting hooker. Big difference to Kingston.You need a real leader and a real power player to lead by example and as many of you believe Walsh is not that, Coote is new to the five-eighth role at least going into full-time and Kingston is more of a defensive hooker that isn't going to pose a major threat in attack.
Yep you are right. Although Mick Gordon has had 3 serious injuries in the last 3 years. Again, Penrith were just not comfortable paying more than they believe he is worth. The offer from Penrith was generous btw.The age game shouldn't be the card being played, Jennings is only 24 and a centre while Mick Gordon is 30 next year and a fullback. So what Storm are going to offload Billy Slater cause he is 30 and keep Justin O'Neill cause he is 20 something?, As I doubt they would come to a scenario like that but Jennings is a complete waste at centre when you don't have good halves to feed him ball and without an obvious fullback for next year.
No panic button has been pressed. Our fullback options for next year are healthy, and Penrith beleive they will get the job done. Just because you have not played much NRL, does not mean you cant handle it from round 1.Penrith hit the panic button too quickly with Gordon's injuries if that was a main concern towards letting him browse at other opportunities. You've got James Roberts and Mansour both from Souths, Mansour obviously in his second year at the club but both are too pre-mature to throw in at Fullback at least Round 1 of next year or any season you don't see many clubs throw in a complete rookie opening up a campaign. Tigers did with Tedesco basically because they had nobody else.
agree 100%. Brown, Manu, Latimore, O'Donnell etcI somewhat agree with offloading Lewis, Very in-consistent player and highly over-paid and just secretly i didn't see an obvious impact in what he offered as your captain. Best forward you had by a mile but if it's workers that will work together over fringe nrl players an a test player then 100% with that, Lewis's money goes towards upgrading what you have by signing 2-3 forwards that may be slightly better then your current starting options.
That could be the case but it's round 23 we should of fixed it by now and haven't. I can't remember a week we didn't have the most possession. That should get us home in most games yet doesn't.
FTR I was excited with Cleary's (As I was with Elliott) arrival injuries are part of footy he needs to have a plan b, c etc if plan doesn't work. Elliott was the same when it worked great when it didn't we had nothing very similar here.
Finally a well thought out post not based on emotion, I agree with what you are sayingGould has almost no power over the team, unless he is required to step in. His job is the business side of things, particulally revolving around the leagues club and its interaction.
Michael Gordon has played something like 10 games in 3 years(??). Penrith offered him a contract, a fair amount of money considering he was being paid for being injured for most of his previous contract. He was offered a bigger offer elsewhere. Gus advised Mick that if the offer is there, take it. I applaud this decision. I applaud Penrith for not paying over what they were comfortable with, and what they budgeted what he was worth. There is no more in this, Penrith were just not comfortable paying over what they believe he is worth, in their eyes. This is something the old administration would not have done.
Matt Moylan, James Roberts, Wes Naiqama, Josh Mansour, Dean Whare. Not a problem.
First of, Coote played 5/8 in the juniors, so not completely new to the position. I will reserve my judgement on Walsh until the end of next year. IMO having Coote at 6 will help his game after an off-season together. Segeyaro is also on his way and will play ~35min a game if he is the bench hooker, of ~45min if he is the starting hooker. Big difference to Kingston.
Yep you are right. Although Mick Gordon has had 3 serious injuries in the last 3 years. Again, Penrith were just not comfortable paying more than they believe he is worth. The offer from Penrith was generous btw.
No panic button has been pressed. Our fullback options for next year are healthy, and Penrith beleive they will get the job done. Just because you have not played much NRL, does not mean you cant handle it from round 1.
agree 100%. Brown, Manu, Latimore, O'Donnell etc
So when do you make a judgement on IC. Personally I think he is a good coach and will do well.
Gus is a good recruiter.
Combined that should be positive.
The worry is the business itself. Not really looking forward to seeing the annual report for 2011-12 but it will be interesting.