As I've said before I think this action is not only unnecessary but will also accomplish nothing. In fact I think it will do more harm than good and is a backward step when it comes to club fan relations.I went over to nospam46 to read about the Dogs rumours.
Gotta say the 12 month club suspension to Phil Sim and the "conditions" to be complied with upon reinstatement is pretty shocking.
Putting nospam46 rivalry aside etc, I never thought that our club would attempt to censor's onstructive criticism by it's own fans.
Great move by the Club!!!
As I've said before I think this action is not only unnecessary but will also accomplish nothing. In fact I think it will do more harm than good and is a backward step when it comes to club fan relations.
You might like our club moving backwards when it comes to its relationship with our fans but I don't. Do you also think that those who run this site should have action taken against them for negative things others say about the board? This is an embarrassment to our club IMO. Has any other club's board ever taken such action because people said things about them that they didn't like?
As I've said before I think this action is not only unnecessary but will also accomplish nothing. In fact I think it will do more harm than good and is a backward step when it comes to club fan relations.
You might like our club moving backwards when it comes to its relationship with our fans but I don't. Do you also think that those who run this site should have action taken against them for negative things others say about the board? This is an embarrassment to our club IMO. Has any other club's board ever taken such action because people said things about them that they didn't like?
seriously Tony, would a loyal fan behave like that ?
a loyal fan would put the club before their own agenda imo
seriously Tony, would a loyal fan behave like that ?
a loyal fan would put the club before their own agenda imo
which he wasn't