Elias1983
Coach
- Messages
- 13,249
Seen on twitter Hastings going to reject roosters offer to stay at the dragons
Need to be a little more specific mate.
Was it from the player himself? Or someone else?
Seen on twitter Hastings going to reject roosters offer to stay at the dragons
Did any of you guys watch his game yesterday against the bunnies??? He is a greedy player and only plays for himself def not nrl material yet he is still playing under 12's style a lot of learning to do it is called TEAM and not just the red carpet for him but the whole family money talks I suppose so what will be will be
Is this the real Possm or the call the Mods fake Possm from the outer limits..
Did any of you guys watch his game yesterday against the bunnies??? He is a greedy player and only plays for himself def not nrl material yet he is still playing under 12's style a lot of learning to do it is called TEAM and not just the red carpet for him but the whole family money talks I suppose so what will be will be
it's not an impersonation, if it was, we'd be seeing more posts. someone just happens to have the same name.
Hey Steelman
Do you think they might keep Harry on?
it's not an impersonation, if it was, we'd be seeing more posts. someone just happens to have the same name.
Yes I do, Mary cutters coach rates Harry highly. Unfortunately drinkwater will probably be moved on as he had some major problems with his game.
All this is depending on what happens with Hastings of course.
Yah I know we are discussing in 3 threads atm, but it doesn't really make sense to have:Yes I do, Mary cutters coach rates Harry highly. Unfortunately drinkwater will probably be moved on as he had some major problems with his game.
All this is depending on what happens with Hastings of course.
Yah I know we are discussing in 3 threads atm, but it doesn't really make sense to have:
Widdop/Williams > Hastings/Harry/Quinlan/Kyle/Crook/Drinkwater/Cummins (maybe)
I mean Crook is a longterm prospect, but the rest are all in the 1st grade squad, some are works in progress, some might play in other positions, but it doesnt add up to keep them all, id say DW is an obvious bloke to leave, but surely 1-2 others would be too, especially if Hastings is staying and being fast-tracked.
I'd be pretty filthy if we let go of Harry. He is a good solid player with a great attitude and would be great depth in the halves - but more than that, its a horrible look for the club to buy a kid halfway through a season with the intention of bringing him into first grade (only had a few games under his belt) and then bugger him off when he gets injured. I couldn't see another club signing him up considering the severity of the injury, the fact that he wont be ready at the start of next season, the fact that he isn't an established first grader and the fact that said club would have to put a bit of money into his rehab.
It could potentially spell the end of a career for a very promising youngster at only 21 years of age. I know that no player is bigger than the club and all that, but it would be incredibly unethical and I dont want the club I love going down that path...
Yah I know we are discussing in 3 threads atm, but it doesn't really make sense to have:
Widdop/Williams > Hastings/Harry/Quinlan/Kyle/Crook/Drinkwater/Cummins (maybe)
I mean Crook is a longterm prospect, but the rest are all in the 1st grade squad, some are works in progress, some might play in other positions, but it doesnt add up to keep them all, id say DW is an obvious bloke to leave, but surely 1-2 others would be too, especially if Hastings is staying and being fast-tracked.
Filthy? Yet you're ready/eager/desperate to dump Kyle Stanley?Absolutely agree.
Will be filthy if we just discard him now.
Kyle is under contract. Dumping him mid-injury is an entirely different kettle of fish, ethically speaking, to Siejka, who is off contract.The Stanleys and Drinkwater are surplus to our needs.