In what position do you think Dane would 'kill it' at his next club?
Centre.
In what position do you think Dane would 'kill it' at his next club?
Ball Boy?
I, like many of you have been watching the club's performances closely and hoping that things are improving. The jury is out but I am happy that we are cleaning house.
We are at a point where I think its time again to reach out to the club for further information and to clarify the clubs position on a few issues as I feel that they are just trying to get to seasons end and hope things improve and some of their public statements and media stories seem to be more about positive PR than anything else.
What does everyone think, is it time to ask some questions?
**** Putting my comments in here as well ****
I will preface my comment by stating clear that I didn't think Stone was the answer but it amazes me that Brown has been given miles more latitude than Stone ever was.
Generally the fans have accepted everything he has said, and the club, at face value this year, something we've never done before.
I am amazed that we are happy to write off years on the assumption that somehow he will get it right.
Somehow we've reached a point where we have to wait another 2-10 yrs before we can avoid the spoon.
Sure he's done some things we've agreed with and show underperformers the door, but the junior experiment is ongoing and his recruitment thus far is cast offs from other clubs or doing the media polka with old players still under contract.
The good times are still just a haze in the distance and does anyone really think players, sponsors and fans will flock to a club that is odds on to win three spoons in a row.
I refuse to drink the koolaid, the club hasn't earnt that right, as we've suffer through 10 plus years of mediocrity, excuse me if I hold judgement until I see meaningful improvement. I haven't seen it yet as we are on target to be the worst ARL / NRL club in 16 yrs.
And let's be realistic about the future, we've never been a club that attract name players easily, after collecting possibly 3 spoons in a row, how will we break the status quo. Also do we actually think that young players will stay long term to be cannon fodder, we have to show them we are building a team and the evidence thus far is limited.
I'm still skeptical about the cap situation as we've let go so many name players and signed no one of note beyond Trent. Is it a convenient excuse that can't be verified but gives unlimited cover to the current hierarchy.
Are we running below the cap deliberately, because we have to due to the NRL turning off the money tap?
Make no mistake, just about every club is making their roster better for 2017, what have we done and who have we signed? Right now it looks highly likely that we'll have a weaker roster than 2016 as we've added no one.
And after we win 2-4 games in 2017, will we all be satisfied with the results?
Sport is an impossible thing to put a timeline for success on, because there are so many uncontrollable factors. Injuries can't be controlled. Other teams fortunes can't be controlled. Junior development, whilst it can be nurtured and have all resources tipped into, largely can't be controlled. Some shine, others plod. What would Brown and he club gain from saying to everyone "in three years time we're going to be premiers"? All it's going to do is place undue pressure on all in the club, and as can be seen from the Tinkler days, most crumble under that sort of pressure. No doubt Brown and the club have an internal timeline and metric they're working to, but there's no point in them releasing it publicly because then they're have every tom, dick and Harry not related to the club at all breathing down their necks to performFred, my point remains, right now we've seen some good and lots of bad and the good times aren't coming any time soon so of course Brown et al are accountable, that's the nature of the roles they fulfil.
I've got a small amount of experience in business and I've never seen a successful plan or process start with no clear metrics or timeline for improvement. Right now we assume things may get better in 2018 but no one quite knows. What have we been told to expect in 2017?
I'm pleased we are making changes but I just can't accept the timeline because I haven't seen one, nor has anyone. How long do we expect to survive winning a few games a year?
Depends what you mean by "guts". For all we know it was admin and back office jobs that have been made completely redundant through the process of combining roles within the organization.You saw Barry's Tooheys article today, we'll make a 600k loss this year cutting the guts out of the club, that's not sustainable, another year like this year and we are done for.
IMO, in the short amount of time they've had they've shown they've been doing plenty, by cutting underperforming, overpaid players, and making sure promising juniors like Tapine know that won't be held to ransom and forced to pay overs anymore. Rome wasn't built in a day, and neither were successful football teamsAccountability is the only tool we have left, show us that the club is doing everything it can to improve. Look at the Bird issue, how long has that been dragging on now, if he's the answer, then get it done and show the long suffering fans that we are doing something.
**** Putting my comments in here as well ****
I will preface my comment by stating clear that I didn't think Stone was the answer but it amazes me that Brown has been given miles more latitude than Stone ever was.
Generally the fans have accepted everything he has said, and the club, at face value this year, something we've never done before.
I am amazed that we are happy to write off years on the assumption that somehow he will get it right.
Somehow we've reached a point where we have to wait another 2-10 yrs before we can avoid the spoon.
Sure he's done some things we've agreed with and show underperformers the door, but the junior experiment is ongoing and his recruitment thus far is cast offs from other clubs or doing the media polka with old players still under contract.
The good times are still just a haze in the distance and does anyone really think players, sponsors and fans will flock to a club that is odds on to win three spoons in a row.
I refuse to drink the koolaid, the club hasn't earnt that right, as we've suffer through 10 plus years of mediocrity, excuse me if I hold judgement until I see meaningful improvement. I haven't seen it yet as we are on target to be the worst ARL / NRL club in 16 yrs.
And let's be realistic about the future, we've never been a club that attract name players easily, after collecting possibly 3 spoons in a row, how will we break the status quo. Also do we actually think that young players will stay long term to be cannon fodder, we have to show them we are building a team and the evidence thus far is limited.
I'm still skeptical about the cap situation as we've let go so many name players and signed no one of note beyond Trent. Is it a convenient excuse that can't be verified but gives unlimited cover to the current hierarchy.
Are we running below the cap deliberately, because we have to due to the NRL turning off the money tap?
Make no mistake, just about every club is making their roster better for 2017, what have we done and who have we signed? Right now it looks highly likely that we'll have a weaker roster than 2016 as we've added no one.
And after we win 2-4 games in 2017, will we all be satisfied with the results?
You saw Barry's Tooheys article today, we'll make a 600k loss this year cutting the guts out of the club, that's not sustainable, another year like this year and we are done for.
How many clubs are making a profit this year?
Parramatta - even with paying players in TPA's in paper bags in a local park - will lose $8 Million this year. Cowboys - even with prize money from winning a premiership - will lose $1 Million.
The NRL will be quite happy with us only losing $600K in all honesty. A few more sponsors will cover that next year...