5k crowds already bigger than WakeyThat's not how the system is going to work. If London want a SL place they have to improve the club. As it should be.
Better stadium
More junior:
5k crowds already bigger than WakeyThat's not how the system is going to work. If London want a SL place they have to improve the club. As it should be.
Have you seen the grading system?5k crowds already bigger than Wakey
Better stadium
More junior:
Is there a minimum capacity for grounds?That's not how the system is going to work. If London want a SL place they have to improve the club. As it should be.
Wakey couldn’t spend full salary cap in super leagueHave you seen the grading system?
Wakey finished 11th and London 24th! Behind a club that went bust. Should tell you something.
London are lower ranked than half the championship clubs, let alone the SL clubs. London has a lot of potential, always had had, but it needs major investors who can fund it for a long time, and they just dont have that at the moment. Throwing them in Sl like has happened this year before they are ready is a disaster and they will undoubtably finish last, possibly without a win all year. Thats not good for London or SL
They have a new rich owner whose throwing money at the club. rumoured theyve just signed International winger Johnstone.Esky
Wakey couldn’t spend full salary cap in super league
They haven’t been missed from super leagueThey have a new rich owner whose throwing money at the club. rumoured theyve just signed International winger Johnstone.
Exclusive: New Wakefield Trinity owner makes huge multi-million investment pledge as he sets out long-term vision
New Wakefield owner Matt Ellis has promised to deliver a sustainable future for the club and has stressed he will invest millions to make that happen.www.loverugbyleague.com
yes 5000 min. 2000 seats.Is there a minimum capacity for grounds?
again irrelevant.They haven’t been missed from super league
London will get more points this year being in super leagueagain irrelevant.
theres a grading system if clubs want to get into SL they need to get their sht together and get a higher points tally than the 12th placed club.
They haven’t been in SL for years, haven’t had a regular home in the last few years. Now they have made their way back up to SL and seem to have found a suitable home ground.Why is London so far down on the list? Don’t really follow SL much last few years
yes 5000 min. 2000 seats.
points for level of utilisation ie, the fuller the stadium the more points.
points for primacy of tenure ie if youre main tenant or owned more points.
points for LED advertising boards
points for permanent big screen
Max for stadium is 3points
Not much money, very few fans low finishing positions and only just moved into stadium. They will score better this year due to position and stadium and hopefully have increased fan reach but still nowhere near top 12.Why is London so far down on the list? Don’t really follow SL much last few years
The theory is full stadiums look better on tv than empty ones.I’ve always found the main tenant and fuller stadium ones a bit pointless. Would I be right in saying that Hull FC getting 14k at MKM would be getting less points than Castleford getting 7k? Toulouse would score better at their old small stadium even if it meant their crowds drop?
What does the bold indicate?Preliminary rankings
Super League
1. Leeds Rhinos – A – 17.49 – Super League
2. Wigan Warriors – A – 16.87 – Super League
3. St Helens – A – 16.78 – Super League
4. Catalans Dragons – A – 16.73 – Super League
5. Warrington Wolves – A – 15.75 – Super League
6. Hull KR – A – 15.52 – Super League
7. Hull FC – A – 15.05 – Super League
8. Salford Red Devils – B – 13.80 – Super League
9. Huddersfield Giants – B – 13.49 – Super League
10. Toulouse Olympique – B – 12.97 – Championship
11. Wakefield Trinity – B – 12.52 – Championship
12. Leigh Leopards – B – 12.45 – Super League
Championship
13. Castleford Tigers – B – 12.16 – Super League
14. Bradford Bulls – B – 12.02 – Championship
15. Featherstone Rovers – B – 10.65 – Championship
16. Widnes Vikings – B – 10.17 – Championship
17. York RLFC – B – 10.05 – Championship
18. Newcastle Thunder – B – 9.30 – TBC
19. Barrow Raiders – B – 9.18 – Championship
20. Halifax Panthers – B – 9.06 – Championship
21. Batley Bulldogs – B – 8.62 – Championship
22. Sheffield Eagles – B – 8.36 – Championship
23. Doncaster RLFC – B – 8.11 – Championship
24. London Broncos – B – 8.07 – Super League
25. Oldham RLFC – C – 7.39 – League 1
26. Swinton Lions – C – 7.21 – Championship
League 1
27. Dewsbury Rams – C – 7.10 – Championship
28. Rochdale Hornets – C – 7.03 – League 1
29. Hunslet RLFC – C – 6.94 – League 1
30. Keighley Cougars – Grade C – 6.58 – League 1
31. Workington Town – C – 6.54 – League 1
32. Whitehaven RLFC – C – 6.27 – Championship
33. Midlands Hurricanes – C – 5.92 – League 1
34. Cornwall RLFC – C – 5.75 – League 1
35. North Wales Crusaders – C – 5.07 – League 1
Clubs not currently in that division that would be if the grading was in effect. So if the grades stayed same Wakey and Toulouse would be in SL and London and Cas would be out.What does the bold indicate?
The theory is full stadiums look better on tv than empty ones.
Yes it should have a score for actual crowd size. That and the fact there are no points for player production are the obvious tweaks it needs.There is no scoring for actual crowd size though. A club getting 18k in a 20k stadium should get more points than a club getting 4.5k in a 5k stadium even though they’re both 90% full.