Stop and think for a moment:
A sports journalist for one of Australia's biggest newspapers has come out and claimed that not only does the NRL have an image problem, but it is the games' fault. The article also mentions the AFL's female attendance figures (suggesting the AFL has a "female friendly" culture throughout its' ranks that is alien to the NRL). It fails to mention the AFL's long, ingrained "You must become a club member/ attend matches to fit into general society" culture that is especially prominent in Melbourne- the games' heartland. This is what drives the difference between the percentage of female attendees at games and any decent sports journalist would be well aware of this- which suggests the author of this article is either a) Ignorant of this fact or b) Deliberately omitting this fact in order to suit their argument. The greatest irony? The article in question is printed the same day an AFL player is charged on multiple accounts of rape. However, this won't be regarded as an example of the AFL's terrible culture but just an unfortunate incident that happened to involve an AFL player. I'd like to see somebody argue it would be exactly the same attitude if an NRL player had been convicted, but that's another story...
They then accuse the NRL of lacking "Blue chip" sponsors. Off the top of my head, right now companies like Telstra, Vodafone, DeLonghi, AAMI, Holden, Jet Star, Toyota, NRMA and St George Bank are all major sponsors of either NRL teams or the entire competition. I'd be interested to know what "Blue chip" sponsors or major Australian companies the AFL, ARU or FFA have in their respective competitions that the NRL are lacking?
Then, if you happen to question or disagree with anything in this article, clearly it means you are an idiot with your head in the sand and not only that- you are part of the problem. The author said it, so you'd better believe it's true. Either you agree with everything they've said or you're one of "them" and the game would be better off without you. The end.
If this article was penned by Bourbon Beccy or Slothfield, it would be rubbished and the vast majority of people would be drawing attention to the same points I've raised above. Yet because it's the opinion of Steve Mascord, apparently we should show complete reverence for every word he's written and treat it as gospel truth?
The NRL could improve it's image, but that has more to do with media training our players to be able to hold the public's interest when they speak as opposed to the 'umm'ing and 'ahhh'ing, the mumbling and all the same boring cliches trotted out every week. It has more to do with the code (as a whole) making more of an effort to promote the good work carried out by 99% of the NRL's players, fans and officials on a daily basis instead of treating Carney, Miles, Monaghan etc. like they are typical of the people in our game and not an unfortunate exception to the rule.
So pardon me (and many others) for disagreeing with the "Code in crisis!" brigade or the people who don't even like sport to begin with- let alone our code...