Fordy20
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,350
I agree 100% Stryker.
I for one will not be unhappy if he goes and if he goes great somewhere else, good luck to him.
I'm concerned that we don't have a hooker for next year locked up. Should be sniffing around Lawton.
I agree 100% Stryker.
I for one will not be unhappy if he goes and if he goes great somewhere else, good luck to him.
Woah woah woah.
Your second sentence is a distortion of the truth. In fact it is bullshit.
Your last sentence is naive.
The kid has shown very little worth a lengthy contract. 2 years max for mine and if he is injured again goneskis.
in the lean years there were 13 on the field at any 1 time 17 named every game but because 2 players were overpaid that gave us the lean years.I think a big part of our lean years was because we overpaid Robbie and Benji.
You keep saying it enough, you will believe it.in the lean years there were 13 on the field at any 1 time 17 named every game but because 2 players were overpaid that gave us the lean years.You keep saying it enough, you will believe it.
Your view is far too simplistic.Stryker - I love both of them. I'm just trying to be honest regarding the fact that we under performed for a while and Robbie's salary and the whole JT debacle really f**ked the club up.
As for stating they bought in more money I think that is irrelevant. We haven't been successful for years.
I think we are unsuccessful beacuse we haven't been able to put a quality team on the park. That comes down to recruitment and retention and that comes down to managing the cap.
There were many reason why we didnt kick on after 2005, in y view, the biggest was that Scott Prince left.
One of very very few genuine halves we ever had in this club.
In my view our lack of success is due to our historical selection of shit coaches.
Whether the coach controls recruitment or not, he still has a say. Buck stops with the coach.
How much game time do you think we should give Liddle and how much should we give Robbie ?Stryker - I agree that my viewpoint is simplistic but there is some truth in it. Those premiership opportunities were lost and Benji and Robbie didn't perform as well as they could have. It's tough though to blame those lost opportunities on just those two. They were our marquee players though.
I also agree that those two are playing well now. I'd still have Liddle getting more game time. Robbie looked shot at the end of the game last week.
How much game time do you think we should give Liddle and how much should we give Robbie ?
Has anyone considered how having two hooker will effect the team as a whole?
Two different players, with different styles and different plays.....
This is a tough one, Liddle needs game time if he is to develop, his service can be patchy at times. At some stage Madge is gonna have to bite the bullet and pick games where he can give Liddle 80 minutes and give Farah a week off. We saw a couple of games late last year where we swapped ET and Liddle around and the service was woeful. It has to be one or the other in my opinion you can’t run a hooker off the bench if that’s all they playI think that this is what Maguire is struggling with and it would be tough. They are very different players at the moment.
Yep a real shame he and Benji were starting to get a good thing going there.Lui aswell
Shame he was scum
