What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Nathan Hindmarsh dismisses retirement talk

Springs

First Grade
Messages
5,682
I reckon this is the best terminology - edge forward and tight forward.

Can we get this nomenclature enshrined in the forum rules so f**ken nitwits like Springs don't keep using out-dated terms like 'lock' and 'second-row'?

Maybe then the game's administration will catch up to the modern day and we won't have to go through the embarassing situation where last year's Dally M Lock and Second-Row awards were both won by edge forwards.

Gallen played tight forward at the Sharks in 2010 but when Jeremy Smith arrived there last year Gallen shifted to the left edge.



It's already been changed mate. Get on board.



Mateo never wore number 13 last year because that number belongs to the Warriors' tight forward Michael Luck. Mateo plays on the left edge as has already been explained to you.



No when he played 6 he played almost exactly like a left-hand edge forward. The only difference was they swap in attack and defence - so the edge forward attacks three in and defends four in, whereas the 'five-eighth' (in that structure at least) attacks four in and defends three in.

In either case these two have the left centre and winger outside them. Or do you think we still play with inside and outside centres?



Mate, nobody "just holds" anywhere. Everyone is expected to work hard off the ball, in both attack and defence. But the game is so fast and the ball movement so good in first grade that Hindy won't be just chasing the ball around the field. He might drift toward the ball as he tracks back with the ref but that is mostly to cover an overlap or a bust. And he will always try to get back into the middle where most of the tackles are to be made.

You watch whenever we start a new defensive set (ie. after an penalty/error or kickoff) - Hindmarsh will be standing in the middle group of four players (with the props and hooker).



Because it's not exactly like lock. 'Lock' refers firstly to a position in the scrum. After that it means different things to different people (cover defender, edge runner, second five-eighth, etc).

I'm sorry the game has left you behind but it's not too late to catch up. We're here to help you.



Agreed. But in attack he's three in from the sideline, and this is definitely the edge. It sure as shit isn't the middle of the field (I nearly called it midfield but I thought you might f**king splinter.)



These days there are only six forwards, but even a distinction like 'forwards' and 'backs' is problematic. You're right that edge forwards defend inside all of the 'backs' but they attack outside the halves - Souths had an option last year that saw Dave Taylor attacking outside both Sutton and Inglis, while defending on their inside.

Instead of being frightened of these changes you should embrace innovation. It is very exciting.



I don't think he's ready for it.



I'll let you work that one out but here's a hint: where do most line breaks (the 'LB' in 'LBA') occur? The middle or the edges?


What the f**k is wrong with you? Just because I want to use the proper terms second row and lock I'm an outdated f**king nitwit? Oh that's funny, everywhere I look everyone else is still using second row and lock. WOW. Even the NRL. f**k the ESL are using Loose Forward how f**king dumb are they ay?!

It's amazing at my club when they read out the names they say 'second rowers - you and you and lock - you'. But don't worry, I'm sure you just think that we're banjo playing country hicks that play on dirt paddocks while you coach the Australian team. Luckily our coach has a big face so we're pretty good.:D

After a penalty, players will usually just run back into the line from wherever they are standing to get ready for the quick tap/restart. From an error, well the forwards are usually in the scrum so you're wrong there, but I guess he is with the props on that occasion. From a kickoff, the wings, centres and halves will be on their side of the field so the forwards will be :shock: in the MIDDLE! WOW.

I notice you use Dave Taylor as an example. Congratulations he usually stood inside the winger when playing prop as well. He is actually encouraged by others to run in the middle as well because he can cause a lot of damage with his offloads.

And no, we can't have this terminlogy enshrined because it's useless. I guess everyone else will have to stay outdated using lock and 2nd row while PouPou and junior rep coaches can go be innovative.

And Hindmarsh follows the play around, he always has. That's why he makes so many tackles. He is rarely more than 2 players away from the play the ball.

And every postion refers to where they stand at the scrum. Except wingers really. And what innovation? It's hardly innovation all you're doing is making up silly terms for old positions. Yes a lock can be a central forward or edge forward but who cares? He can also be a cover defender or second five-eighth. So calling backrowers definite edge and tight forwards would be as silly as making up a 'five-eighth 2' for Fittler when he played 13.

And Gallen was barely an edge forward. No one makes that amount of tackles and metres only playing on the edge. Otherwise he would have stats like Ben Creagh.
 

PJ Marshal

Coach
Messages
13,525
I reckon this is the best terminology - edge forward and tight forward.

Can we get this nomenclature enshrined in the forum rules so f**ken nitwits like Springs don't keep using out-dated terms like 'lock' and 'second-row'?

Maybe then the game's administration will catch up to the modern day and we won't have to go through the embarassing situation where last year's Dally M Lock and Second-Row awards were both won by edge forwards.

Gallen played tight forward at the Sharks in 2010 but when Jeremy Smith arrived there last year Gallen shifted to the left edge.



It's already been changed mate. Get on board.



Mateo never wore number 13 last year because that number belongs to the Warriors' tight forward Michael Luck. Mateo plays on the left edge as has already been explained to you.



No when he played 6 he played almost exactly like a left-hand edge forward. The only difference was they swap in attack and defence - so the edge forward attacks three in and defends four in, whereas the 'five-eighth' (in that structure at least) attacks four in and defends three in.

In either case these two have the left centre and winger outside them. Or do you think we still play with inside and outside centres?



Mate, nobody "just holds" anywhere. Everyone is expected to work hard off the ball, in both attack and defence. But the game is so fast and the ball movement so good in first grade that Hindy won't be just chasing the ball around the field. He might drift toward the ball as he tracks back with the ref but that is mostly to cover an overlap or a bust. And he will always try to get back into the middle where most of the tackles are to be made.

You watch whenever we start a new defensive set (ie. after an penalty/error or kickoff) - Hindmarsh will be standing in the middle group of four players (with the props and hooker).



Because it's not exactly like lock. 'Lock' refers firstly to a position in the scrum. After that it means different things to different people (cover defender, edge runner, second five-eighth, etc).

I'm sorry the game has left you behind but it's not too late to catch up. We're here to help you.



Agreed. But in attack he's three in from the sideline, and this is definitely the edge. It sure as shit isn't the middle of the field (I nearly called it midfield but I thought you might f**king splinter.)



These days there are only six forwards, but even a distinction like 'forwards' and 'backs' is problematic. You're right that edge forwards defend inside all of the 'backs' but they attack outside the halves - Souths had an option last year that saw Dave Taylor attacking outside both Sutton and Inglis, while defending on their inside.

Instead of being frightened of these changes you should embrace innovation. It is very exciting.



I don't think he's ready for it.



I'll let you work that one out but here's a hint: where do most line breaks (the 'LB' in 'LBA') occur? The middle or the edges?


what Level Rugby League coaching accreditation do you hold?
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,322
what Level Rugby League coaching accreditation do you hold?

I'm talking about the basics of the modern game. Surely you don't think you need to hold a coaching ticket to know this stuff?

For the record, when I played we called it 'lock' and 'second row', and it only referred to packing scrums - all they did was take hit-ups and then got out of the way when it was backs' ball.

To be honest, even in the 90s we still played the centres together, but that's schoolboy and park footy. The NRL left that shit brand of footy behind years ago - looking back it wasn't much different from union.

It spins me out when people don't notice how much the game has changed. What's wrong with you people?
 

B-Tron 3000

Juniors
Messages
1,803
It spins me out when people don't notice how much the game has changed. What's wrong with you people?

What chance do most people have when journalists - those who are paid to watch the game and interpret it - focus on gossip and crap?

I remember once reading a Paul Kent article where he referred to some of the 'new' names for defensive positions. I thought "excellent, I'm learning something here". Not long after he was shipped off to cover European soccer, of which he hasn't a f**king clue.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
78,006
I'm talking about the basics of the modern game. Surely you don't think you need to hold a coaching ticket to know this stuff?

For the record, when I played we called it 'lock' and 'second row', and it only referred to packing scrums - all they did was take hit-ups and then got out of the way when it was backs' ball.

To be honest, even in the 90s we still played the centres together, but that's schoolboy and park footy. The NRL left that shit brand of footy behind years ago - looking back it wasn't much different from union.

It spins me out when people don't notice how much the game has changed. What's wrong with you people?

Clearly you are one of the great minds of the game. It spins me out why a club haven't snapped you up. What's wrong with those people ?
 

TheParraboy

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
69,204
Clearly you are one of the great minds of the game. It spins me out why a club haven't snapped you up. What's wrong with those people ?

Ive narrowed it down, I think PouPou is either Paul Langmack, Nathan Brown or Kevin Sheedy
 

fanaticeel

Juniors
Messages
916
I tink he gives me an insight into the modern game. However I will continue to refer to 'lock' 'second row'. As a back all i needed to know come scrum time was who was the loose head prop and where was my fullback..

I don't mind reading other people's insights into the game. Doesn't mean I should belittle those attempts. Nor does it mean that I take them as gospel.

The game has changed from the 80's and 90's and for the better. I believe the modern day forward (this means all those names used who play with numbers between 8 - 13 - not allowing for the interchange players atm) has to be way more agile and faster and have greater recovery time as it has become more of a running game.

Which I enjoy watching. This doesnt necessarily mean high scores either.

Anyway thats my 2 cents for today... back to work.

Oh and I was a junior footy coach, I have coached 3 under 15's teams and certainly used the phrases centre forward, tight forward and edge forward however when I am watching for enjoyment they are lock and second rowers... :D
 

Springs

First Grade
Messages
5,682
I'm talking about the basics of the modern game. Surely you don't think you need to hold a coaching ticket to know this stuff?

For the record, when I played we called it 'lock' and 'second row', and it only referred to packing scrums - all they did was take hit-ups and then got out of the way when it was backs' ball.

To be honest, even in the 90s we still played the centres together, but that's schoolboy and park footy. The NRL left that shit brand of footy behind years ago - looking back it wasn't much different from union.

It spins me out when people don't notice how much the game has changed. What's wrong with you people?

Well you need to know what they are actually calling positions and how they are playing. Not just watch the games and come up with this central back row crap. For the record, in the 2010s we still call it lock and second row.

And it wasn't shit. Obviously the game has changed but it's still Rugby League. Not everything has changed for the better either.

You would have noticed a lot of old players and experts hate the left and right and edge and tight crap.

Clearly you are one of the great minds of the game. It spins me out why a club haven't snapped you up. What's wrong with those people ?

It baffles me.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,322
You would have noticed a lot of old players and experts hate the left and right and edge and tight crap.

Probably why none of them have coaching jobs.

Wayne Bennett is nearly 90 years old and he's happy with the "left and right and edge and tight crap". What a wanker hey?

Clearly you are one of the great minds of the game.

Only compared to you merkins.

I initially came here to learn but I've ended up spending most of my time teaching. Such a f**king disappointment.
 

PJ Marshal

Coach
Messages
13,525
I'm talking about the basics of the modern game. Surely you don't think you need to hold a coaching ticket to know this stuff?

For the record, when I played we called it 'lock' and 'second row', and it only referred to packing scrums - all they did was take hit-ups and then got out of the way when it was backs' ball.

To be honest, even in the 90s we still played the centres together, but that's schoolboy and park footy. The NRL left that shit brand of footy behind years ago - looking back it wasn't much different from union.

It spins me out when people don't notice how much the game has changed. What's wrong with you people?

dude answer my question , what level coaching accreditation do you hold?
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
I'd have been interested on SK's opinion on this. I wonder if anyone asked at the fan forum this evening. Then we can get closure.
 

Latest posts

Top