He’s saying broadcasters don’t want a team in Perth
he should’ve added they do want another nz team (sky does) so that’s where it should go
They actually want Brisbane content
He’s saying broadcasters don’t want a team in Perth
he should’ve added they do want another nz team (sky does) so that’s where it should go
Yes Aussie tv companiesThey actually want Brisbane content
English?
If you are talking about the Dolphins than that has been settled and not many people would have argued that the decision to go for another Brisbane side was a bad one (people might split hairs on the choice of the team but not the idea)
We’re talking about the next team
Sky New Zealand Chief Executive Sophie Moloney said the partnership was more than a broadcast deal.ARL, Sky New Zealand agree to long-term TV deal
State of Origin fixtures and a selection of premium NRL matches be available on free-to-air TV in New Zealand for the first time as a part of a new broadcast rights deal between the ARL Commission and Sky New Zealand.www.nrl.com
“State of Origin fixtures and a selection of premium NRL matches will be available on free-to-air TV in New Zealand for the first time in a new broadcast rights deal between the ARL Commission and Sky New Zealand.”
I would imagine the tv ratings for origin will be massive
That’s probably the weakest argument you could come up with. It’s not like a lot of teams are playing in world class state of the art venues.
Stuff
i.stuff.co.nz
because rugby league gets excellent ratings in nz and more so this year with the coverage on fta
at times it rivals the all blacks
sky nz don’t pay 38 million dollars a year for one nz team out of charity
the nrl ratings for Perth have always been poor
foxtel has no interest in a Perth team when they already have afl
In the 2022 season aggregate figure, what constitutes a "viewer"?Nrl beat afl by 23 million viewers last year (excluding nz ratings)
From what I recall the "growth" was in streaming.He had put up a rather large post (I can’t be bothered finding it but somebody on this forum might) detailing the growth in ratings.
ARL, Sky New Zealand agree to long-term TV deal
State of Origin fixtures and a selection of premium NRL matches be available on free-to-air TV in New Zealand for the first time as a part of a new broadcast rights deal between the ARL Commission and Sky New Zealand.www.nrl.com
“State of Origin fixtures and a selection of premium NRL matches will be available on free-to-air TV in New Zealand for the first time in a new broadcast rights deal between the ARL Commission and Sky New Zealand.”
I would imagine the tv ratings for origin will be massive
Sky New Zealand Chief Executive Sophie Moloney said the partnership was more than a broadcast deal.
"Through our partnership we have committed to working even more closely with NRL and NZRL to grow the game of Rugby League in New Zealand, like the roadshow we have on this weekend in Christchurch with the Warriors and NZRL," she said.
hmm adding another nz nrl side would grow the game too
Stats are complied by sampling just like they do in England for barbIn the 2022 season aggregate figure, what constitutes a "viewer"?
From what I recall the "growth" was in streaming.
In the 2022 season aggregate figure, what constitutes a "viewer"?
From what I recall the "growth" was in streaming.
I know that. What I'm getting at is that in the age of streaming what counts as a viewer is not what would have counted as a viewer 10 years ago.Stats are complied by sampling just like they do in England for barb
ARL, Sky New Zealand agree to long-term TV deal
State of Origin fixtures and a selection of premium NRL matches be available on free-to-air TV in New Zealand for the first time as a part of a new broadcast rights deal between the ARL Commission and Sky New Zealand.www.nrl.com
“State of Origin fixtures and a selection of premium NRL matches will be available on free-to-air TV in New Zealand for the first time in a new broadcast rights deal between the ARL Commission and Sky New Zealand.”
I would imagine the tv ratings for origin will be massive
It's not my argument you just can't read
You know Sky having no competition means that they can and are ..charging more for their services....Shit you talk bullshit Wally. They rated lower than the average Warriors game. Only the first one was on free to air.
And SKy wont pay for it. They no longer have competition.
And despite your lies, there are not enough juniors or pathways. A second team will do very little to help that.
Abdo said the Firehawks and Jets are still a chance of getting the 18th licence.Have the other Brisbane bids disbanded & been told they'll never get in?! Pretty sure NRL told them to keep going for next round of expansion
Pretty sure foxtel know how to count the numbers of their viewers on kayoI know that. What I'm getting at is that in the age of streaming what counts as a viewer is not what would have counted as a viewer 10 years ago.
Claims of growth are only credible if the figures are like-for-like.
That's irrelevant. Viable Perth & Adelaide would be good for game
Just because they charge more doesn't mean they'll spend it on the NRL. They'll pay no more than the bare minimum because there's no competition.You know Sky having no competition means that they can and are ..charging more for their services....
Which actually means they have more they can afford to spend.
That's a fair point.Sydney teams are viable though at this point in time. Now you might disagree with the reasons or methods in which they are viable but that is a conflation of a moral argument with a factual one.
Now if that changes that changes (leagues clubs or pokies go under for example) and the market will dictate your point. At that point a Sydney team will die, you will be vindicated and a team outside of Sydney will likely replace them
However I don’t see the point in preemptively killing teams because you don’t like pokies funding clubs.