What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

New Zealand 2 will deal a massive blow to NZ rugby

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
Why would they lose their investment

you just told me above they know all about growing the game

listen I’ll give you a tip since you don’t understand, private equity is a terrible way to try and grow a sport

but as a league fan I’m overjoyed Union did this and you can see already it’s impact

I was right you don't understand basic economics.

The Six Nations, like NZR set up a new company. This company controls the revenue that comes from the product, i.e TV rights, sponsorship, ticket sales. That company is then part sold to Private equity and the stake holders of that company take out "dividend" from that sale.
This company is a limited liability company, meaning that only the company is responsible for its debts.
Should this company go bust and the assets are liquidated, the assets being only the intangible tv rights sponsorship contracts and the like, then the shares become worthless. The PE company loses their investment and the countries get to set up a new company to start again at no real loss.

Of course the PE company wants to maximise the return on that investment so they help grow the game.

Like I said, its basic economics, even you should be able to understand that.
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,242
I was right you don't understand basic economics.

The Six Nations, like NZR set up a new company. This company controls the revenue that comes from the product, i.e TV rights, sponsorship, ticket sales. That company is then part sold to Private equity and the stake holders of that company take out "dividend" from that sale.
This company is a limited liability company, meaning that only the company is responsible for its debts.
Should this company go bust and the assets are liquidated, the assets being only the intangible tv rights sponsorship contracts and the like, then the shares become worthless. The PE company loses their investment and the countries get to set up a new company to start again at no real loss.

Of course the PE company wants to maximise the return on that investment so they help grow the game.

Like I said, its basic economics, even you should be able to understand that.
No mate. A company's debts can be recovered through stakeholders and owners in the event of bankruptcy.

You're actually trying to brush off bankruptcy now🤣
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
No mate. A company's debts can be recovered through stakeholders and owners in the event of bankruptcy.

You're actually trying to brush off bankruptcy now🤣

Another one who doesn't understand company structures.

Under NZ, UK, European, US and probably Australian company law limited liability company's limited extends only to its shareholders assets in the company. Creditors can try and sue directors for damages, but that is only if they show negligence and wont extend to entities.
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
Another one who doesn't understand company structures.

Under NZ, UK, European, US and probably Australian company law limited liability company's limited extends only to its shareholders assets in the company. Creditors can try and sue directors for damages, but that is only if they show negligence and wont extend to entities.
And as I suspected, even under Australian law
  • Limited liability - The company is its own legal entity, so the liability of members or owners is limited. Generally, members will not be personally liable for the debts of the company in their capacity as a member. However, members and directors may still be liable for a company’s debts in certain circumstances, such as when they have provided personal guarantees to borrow money.


Want to try again?
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,242
And as I suspected, even under Australian law
  • Limited liability - The company is its own legal entity, so the liability of members or owners is limited. Generally, members will not be personally liable for the debts of the company in their capacity as a member. However, members and directors may still be liable for a company’s debts in certain circumstances, such as when they have provided personal guarantees to borrow money.


Want to try again?
Dance monkey dance 😎
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,542
No mate. A company's debts can be recovered through stakeholders and owners in the event of bankruptcy.

You're actually trying to brush off bankruptcy now🤣
It’s pretty funny some weirdo from New Zealand which is almost a third world country trying to lecture people about economics

I understand perfectly things like leveraged buyouts and private equity

hedge funds are only interested in making profits

I think he’s trying to say if the English club game failed totally it doesn’t matter because they can still play internationals

it’s just a weird argument

i think he will just say anything for the sake of an argument

look at the glazers at man utd and how hated they are by fans. They are bleeding the club dry in dividends and interest payments

as will private equity esp after the English club took owners largely took the money themselves to repay loans rather than invest in new grounds or the business
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
It’s pretty funny some weirdo from New Zealand which is almost a third world country trying to lecture people about economics

I understand perfectly things like leveraged buyouts and private equity

hedge funds are only interested in making profits

I think he’s trying to say if the English club game failed totally it doesn’t matter because they can still play internationals

it’s just a weird argument

i think he will just say anything for the sake of an argument

look at the glazers at man utd and how hated they are by fans. They are bleeding the club dry in dividends and interest payments

as will private equity esp after the English club took owners largely took the money themselves to repay loans rather than invest in new grounds or the business
You really don't understand "private equity" if you are talking about "leveraged buyouts".

The only thing you got right in that entire post is "hedge funds are only interested in making profits" which is why they will help their investment partners increase revenue, to increase growth, and this increase profits.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,542
You really don't understand "private equity" if you are talking about "leveraged buyouts".

The only thing you got right in that entire post is "hedge funds are only interested in making profits" which is why they will help their investment partners increase revenue, to increase growth, and this increase profits.
And when their partners take the money out as a repayment of past loans there is no extra profit

so their cut comes out of existing revenue and hence diluted revenues in the game

anyrhing else you need help with ? Lol
 

Pippen94

First Grade
Messages
7,585
A second NRL team will see the demise of the all blacks despite warriors existing & struggling for 30 years. In turn all blacks folding will destroy all of international rugby including the six nations which boasts average crowds of 64k with no all blacks. UK rugby league which exists now only in pockets of northern england & a few towns in southern France & with barely a TV deal, will scoop up all the displaced rugby union fans, not soccer with its endless resources & exposure.

This thread is all timer
 

Te Kaha

First Grade
Messages
5,998
And when their partners take the money out as a repayment of past loans there is no extra profit

so their cut comes out of existing revenue and hence diluted revenues in the game

anyrhing else you need help with ? Lol

Except that isn't true. Nothing has been "taken out". The money used was from the purchase of shares in the newly formed company. Added to that you're assuming that they still can't increase revenue.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
35,542
Except that isn't true. Nothing has been "taken out". The money used was from the purchase of shares in the newly formed company. Added to that you're assuming that they still can't increase revenue.
Each club could’ve used that money to buy a ground or build a hotel or invest in property

it wasn’t invested in anything

it was mostly used to cover player wages and taken back to owners for loan repayments

that’s why the clubs are struggling financially now
 

Gobsmacked

Bench
Messages
3,242
Each club could’ve used that money to buy a ground or build a hotel or invest in property

it wasn’t invested in anything

it was mostly used to cover player wages and taken back to owners for loan repayments

that’s why the clubs are struggling financially now
The funny part is that the thread started out with him just trying to ignore the problems with Super Rugby and now we're talking bankruptcy in England...🤣
Running around trying to plug holes in the ship🤣
We haven't got around to the legal action happening in France yet.. 🤣
 

Latest posts

Top