flippikat
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,246
could always go to 20 teams, which would spread the money thinner, which would put more stress on struggling clubs who would then fold or drop a tier, then eventually we're left with 18-16 teams again anyway, and if not then we get to keep a 20 team comp with all the clubs surviving, so win-win
That's what I suspect may happen if we go to 20 teams (financial pressure on Sydney clubs, leading us back to 18 or 16 teams).. but if it can be made to work with 20, I'd be happy with that - adding Brisbane 2, Perth in next expansion.. then NZ 2 and either Adelaide, Brisbane 3 or Melbourne 2 as the 20th team.
I think Stallion and Perth Red both have good arguments, (yes tradition matters.. and a strong traditional club can be a league's greatest asset, but very few national leagues have the concentration of teams in one city that NRL has - there must be an economic reason why...), and I'm wary of whether Sydney can sustain the teams it has, against so many "one town teams". We already have a huge gap between the "haves" and the "have nots".