KFC said:
You can bag Paul Kind all you like but the NRL have bugger all money to spend making TV commercials let alone run them.
In the glory days of Simply The Best Rothmans were throwing tens of millions of dollars at the NSWRL/ARL.
Another point for you haters is that the same agency that produced the legendary Tina Turner campaign still works on the marketing today.
As for Blind Freddie how about a positive contribution.
What would you do?
And who's accountable and responsible for the NRL generating money??? Nobody else but the NRL ..... so the cycle continues.
I've already put my $0.02 in this thread about which direction it should head to.
Usually i am very postive about the game, but when it come to marketing i'm sorry but there is nothing positive to say about it, only that the best ad for the sport is during the season with the matches on the field...the last decent campaign blitz was 15 odd years ago, coincidently when league went gangbusters before the SL war.
What does the NRL do to bring in followers from "non heartland" states?? is this comparable to what the AFL does for example???
Why are our campaign ads constantly targeting the same demographic?? the ones that are already entrenched into the game? Why doesn't the league spread its wings and go for a wider variety of audience and stop pigeon holing itself to the 'working class" stereotype?
Is there enough ads for all games on FTA TV during the week??
Paul kind and his gang need to go loud and unavoidably stick Rugby league in everybody's face. Like we have copped with AFL for far too long and like what we are currently copping off the political parties for the upcoming election.....