NRL officially docks 2 points over Bulldogs 14 players

[mickdo]

Dogs should lose the points. Tough luck.

 

[bartman]

I can cop a fine and hope it's passed on from Ryan and Ayoub's salary because they're idiots. I don't think 2 points is justifiable.

You'll just have a harder fall then, if the NRL confirms that it is justifiable...

 

[Y2Eel]

I disagree Paul, because the punishment doesn't fit the crime.

I think Tallis might have been onto something - all players have to come on and leave from a designated area (unless they are on the medicab). This should remove all confusion as to who's coming on and going off.

They basiacally do dont they? they hand the card to the official which ryan didnt... Tough luck

 

[skeepe]

You talking from your arse? He clearly gives the NRL official the number 9!

Was going on the news reports. No need to get so abusive.

 

[Timmah]

Why be so sure of your uninformed opinion then? :sarcasm:

 

[Sea_Eagles_Rock]

The bulldogs disregard for the image of the game just cost *insert club* a $1.5m sponsor deal. Oh wait, somebody has already used a line like that before... Who was it?

 

[Timmah]

:lol:

A player intentionally getting drunk vs an error in interchange on the field :lol:

So comparable :lol:

 

[bartman]

Has this appeal been heard/decided yet? ....zzzzzzzzzz

 

[Timmah]

They have 5 business days bartman, ease up

 

[Johns Magic]

:lol:

A player intentionally getting drunk vs an error in interchange on the field :lol:

So comparable :lol:

Why don't you throw in another emoticon to make yourself feel like you're winning the argument.

Someone intentionally getting drunk...wow, it's not like millions of Australians don't do that every week.

 

[Timmah]

I will - you're a dickhead... here it is for your benefit: :lol:

If you want to get into semantics about the Brett Stewart case, fire away, I'm happy to entertain you. But your reply then was weak as piss and you know it. Surely you've got better, I've seen you at your best.

 

[typicalfan]

:lol:

A player intentionally getting drunk vs an error in interchange on the field :lol:

So comparable :lol:

that is a horribly slanted way of looking at it.

It could be seen as:

Player has a few too many v Team illegally fields 14 men when the game is on the line and helps to score the final try.

 

[Johns Magic]

I will - you're a dickhead... here it is for your benefit: :lol:

There you go. Feel smart now? Just to let you know, you're not.

If you want to get into semantics about the Brett Stewart case, fire away, I'm happy to entertain you.

Okay, let's go. Without you jumping to conclusions over allegations. But then again, you surely wouldn't do that after what happened to the Dogs would you?

But your reply then was weak as piss and you know it. Surely you've got better, I've seen you at your best.

I didn't need better then to point out what a dipsh*t you are.

 

[Johns Magic]

that is a horribly slanted way of looking at it.

It could be seen as:

Player has a few too many v Team illegally fields 14 men when the game is on the line and helps to score the final try.

Hey hey, let's look at who we're dealing with here.

After all, it's one rule for the Dogs and another rule for the rest of the competition...

 

[typicalfan]

The rule says we lose two points "but i dont think its justifiable" :roll:

 

[bartman]

They have 5 business days bartman, ease up

You're kidding? 4 more days of this sh*t... :?

The Bulldogs club should do the decent thing and just cop the decision on the chin, and get on with the next game.

 

[Syko]

shutup timmah, your team has a habbit of cheating, they know they messed up.. again.

 

[ibeme]

You're kidding? 4 more days of this sh*t... :?

The Bulldogs club should do the decent thing and just cop the decision on the chin, and get on with the next game.

Because there are two competition points at stake, and if the dogs can manage to save those points by going through the proper appeal channels, then they have a duty to do so. That's why the appeal system exists. That's why they were given time to appeal the decision.

 

[SuperSoward]

I will - you're a dickhead... here it is for your benefit: :lol:

If you want to get into semantics about the Brett Stewart case, fire away, I'm happy to entertain you. But your reply then was weak as piss and you know it. Surely you've got better, I've seen you at your best.

Oi WTF, What the hell does Brett Stewart have to do with the Bulldogs having 14 on the field.
He has nothing to do with it.
After all, the thread is called 'Bulldogs 14 players'.
Why bring up Brett Stewart for?
That is just silly bra.

 

[bartman]

Because there are two competition points at stake, and if the dogs can manage to save those points by going through the proper appeal channels, then they have a duty to do so. That's why the appeal system exists. That's why they were given time to appeal the decision.

Ah, I think you take the gee ups too seriously ;-)