Now the Raiders aren't in the NSWRL, doesn't mean the local competition will halt, its essentially run by the Raiders, and that'll continue. What will stop over time is the top line juniors getting fed into NSW qualification teams... and they'll get fed into QLD teams probably. And this is entirely of the Sydney clubs, and NSWRL's making.
If the NSWRL wants every team to have a full NSW Cup side, it should be making the Sydney clubs do it. Do you understand the inequity in this? Seems to be too complex for you. And of course, when the Sydney clubs voted to kill the Premier League, they brought this on themselves and the NSWRL. Now they want to force Canberra to run a team at full cost, when that doesn't apply to Sydney teams.
If every NRL team were forced to run a full reserves outfit, in a national league, then that'd be equitable; in the meantime, clubs should have the flexibility to work out what is most suitable for them in the "third tier", especially geographically remote clubs like Canberra.
Orford's contract appears to be financed via a third party contract, at least to a significant extent, so I don't expect that funding would be available for a NSW Cup team... it's available for Orford. And the bit that is counted on the salary cap, well that's not transferable either... by NRL regulation, the salary cap has to be spent on the top playing roster.
You really make a lot of assumptions and claims without understanding the actual position, don't you?