I dont know what goes through the heads of some of these selectors. I mean this 21 man squad is just ridiculous. And out of the 21 we cant work out who's going to play where.
For starters they picked 4 centres, and only 3 front rowers. If I recall teams have only 2 centres. And Beau Scott ahead of Michael Jennings is f***d. So once again we'll probably see Idris come off the bench what a waste that'll be again.
Once again we're one less prop down, why no Snowden, Mannah, Douglas.
I mean I hear Weyman's in doubt, and should he be ruled out, that means we're down to 2 props out of 21. Who's going to play prop out of the 21 players already being named, apart from of course White and King.
I mean its just ridiculous.
bullsh*t. Let me see, who's opinion should I take: Wayne Bennett's, or some f**kwit Tigers supporter having a cry? I think I'll go with the former.
Mind you, Lawrence definitely should have been picked (at the least) ahead of Idris. Better player with more experience. And if Galloway isn't injured then he should have got a run ahead of the cream puff White. There's a bees dick between Ennis and Farah as far as I'm concerned, so I'm happy whichever way they jump between those two.
But Lawrence is about five times the player Scott is.
:crazy::lol:
Who said I don't care about defence? FFS you people are deluded. Defence is not our problem, attack is.
Go back and look at the tries we scored in game one. All lucky tries, most of them off kicks with lucky bounces. Nothing at all creative or constructive in attack. If you disagree I can't help you and can only assume you are watching different games.
And still not one person has answered the questions about Scott's attack. Is it that hard?
:crazy::lol:
So Jennings or Lawrence would bring a creative and constructive attack?? I thought that was the job of the half and 5/8. Jennings was going to call the shots and make the 5th tackle plays? Or was it Lawrence that's going to kick us out of trouble???
as for Gasnier forcing Scott back to second row, if Gasnier was to return to the Tigers as left centre then Lawrence would be dropped all together from FG.
So Jennings or Lawrence would bring a creative and constructive attack?? I thought that was the job of the half and 5/8. Jennings was going to call the shots and make the 5th tackle plays? Or was it Lawrence that's going to kick us out of trouble???:lol:
as for Gasnier forcing Scott back to second row, if Gasnier was to return to the Tigers as left centre then Lawrence would be dropped all together from FG.
Who said I don't care about defence? FFS you people are deluded. Defence is not our problem, attack is.
Go back and look at the tries we scored in game one. All lucky tries, most of them off kicks with lucky bounces. Nothing at all creative or constructive in attack. If you disagree I can't help you and can only assume you are watching different games.
And still not one person has answered the questions about Scott's attack. Is it that hard?
Our lack of points came from picking a centre as a 5/8 how much ball did Cooper, Idris, Tahu, Hayne or Morris get in that game??? And how many sets did NSW have on there line? Not many. Our kicking game was sh*t house and our feild position for attack struggled because of it.
5 times is a bit of a stretch but Lawrence is a much better footballer than Scott.
Just so you know that those that disagree with you aren't actually sticking pins into a Beau Scott voodoo doll, Scott is very solid at club level.
So why in God's name is potentially picking Scott going to improve the team?
That's the crux of what Hybrid is asking you Dragons fans.
Who said I don't care about defence? FFS you people are deluded. Defence is not our problem, attack is.
Go back and look at the tries we scored in game one. All lucky tries, most of them off kicks with lucky bounces. Nothing at all creative or constructive in attack. If you disagree I can't help you and can only assume you are watching different games.
And still not one person has answered the questions about Scott's attack. Is it that hard?
Once again, laugh and ridicule but don't provide any answers. You clearly fail to see my point.