Bumble
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,995
he shoots he scores
Other QB's with only one Superbowl victory - Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypien, Trent Dilfer.......
Legend tbf
he shoots he scores
Other QB's with only one Superbowl victory - Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypien, Trent Dilfer.......
offcourse, he made his 0-line bloke etc right right...
Brady on the otherhand? nah his o-line made him look great right?
superbowls = Brady
Better = Brady
pretty simple actually
and yes you read it right - Seau did look good at 42 in charge of the NE defense however....
he shoots he scores
Other QB's with only one Superbowl victory - Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypien, Trent Dilfer.......
He's not too bad atleast he showed some balls when he criticised Bellichick.
Oh and it's alot easier to be the QB when you know what the defense is calling... Spy gate.... .... ...
He's not too bad atleast he showed some balls when he criticised Bellichick.
Oh and it's alot easier to be the QB when you know what the defense is calling... Spy gate.... .... ...
Awesome. Cant believe it took this long.
The Brady/Manning argument is stupid. I want the writer of the OP banned :sarcasm::crazy:
And lost the superbowl because they didn't have film of the giants walkthrough.awwww the old spy gate excuse - proven to be one of the most overrated events in NFL history and after spygate they went 17-0
Brusci is a punk, overrated, cheap shot merchant everything
Manning has made his O-Line look good year after year after year. The Colts never use high drafts picks on O-Lineman unlike the Pats. The only one is Tony Ugoh who barely plays these days.
Sure Ben R.... is good and can avoid a sack as good as anyone but to put him in the same category as Brady and Manning is ridiculous. There are reasons he doesn't get spoken about when the topic of best Qb comes up on any of the networks.
the pats then go to indi, are thrashing them and then a series of unfortunate events loses them the game. weird and unexlainable sh*t goes down.
the colts then play rex grossman in the superbowl.
brady is better. 3 superbowls and a 50td year.
I respectfully disagree.
The reason Brady and Manning are spoken about in ways no other QB is is pretty much because they're the commentators' flavour of the month. That's not to say they are bad players, because they are both great QBs. But it's much like NRL commentators' obssession with Andrew Johns - super talented, sure, but best ever? Hmmm...
One thing they always prattle on about regarding Manning and Brady is their ability to win a game at the death. Anyone catch Pittsburgh's 37-36 win against Green Bay? Ben Roethlisberger won them the game with a TD after full-time after trailing by 6. He went on a drive and threw the game-winning TD. Not only that, he avoided several strong sack attempts to keep the game alive.
I just don't think you can be quite so dismissive of a young QB who has already won 2 rings (and will win more before he retires), is the most sacked QB in the league (and yet he still has success) and is a leader of men. He may not have the same skill sets as a Brady or Manning, but I would easily put Big Ben up there with them based on his impressive record.
Now, if you wanted to compare QBs solely on brains or aptitude for the game, then yeah - Brady and Manning are in a league of their own.
Weird unexplainable sh*t?
Like the Colts O-Line finally dominating the Pats? Like Manning making clutch pass after pass? Like Brady throwing an INT on a potential game winning drive?
The Pats Vs Colts was the real Superbowl that year.
Lets not get started on Brady's 50 TD year Vs Mannings 49 TD year. Brady is out there throwing bombs when up 35-0 while Manning barely played 14 games that year when you take out all the time he sat out.
If you judge who is the best QB by Superbowl wins then fine, Brady wins. If you do it by every other facet of being a QB then Manning wins most of those categories comfortably.