2012....Sharks Year
First Grade
- Messages
- 5,569
Looks like DUI has had the vibrator out again.....another anti-sharks tirade in the telecrap.
Looks like DUI has had the vibrator out again.....another anti-sharks tirade in the telecrap.
Has she sobbered up or is she typing whislt pissed.
yeah well the cops do it all the time as do polis of all persuasions
i dunno if you are gunna find much solace in waiting for that to save our ass
the elephant in the room is essendon itself and by extension the sharks
if they ran a doping regime as concluded by asada then why arent they under threat of suspension as a club as per wada regs
thats really the big one for us
Exactly. 2 years jail for a government employee leaking confidential information
Still with this nonsense?? No one is going to be charged, anyone involved in the investigation would not be talking, even if they were, it would be impossible to prove and even then, they would never get jail. The legislation you are talking about was written to protect national secrets.
Its the media speculating. Just like it has been for the past 12 months.
What doesnt help is the assumption by the media & even by people like yourself that a doping regime was being conducted.
Itsa supplement regime & it goes on even at the Australian Institute of Sport to this very day.
ASADA have already tried to get the bombers on a substance that they said was banned. They now realise that at the time, it wasnt banned &they themselves advised Dank that it wasn't..
You know nothing you dumb kunjjtt.
The lawyer for Essendon has evidence of who the leaks are in ASADA & is pressing the Federal police to go after them & they are at risk of minimum 2 years jail.
I think I will take a Queens council opinion over yours.
If you are a Fed, its the quality of people like you weorking for the public why this country is such a mess.
Yoiu are a low life.
You know nothing you dumb kunjjtt.
The lawyer for Essendon has evidence of who the leaks are in ASADA & is pressing the Federal police to go after them & they are at risk of minimum 2 years jail.
I think I will take a Queens council opinion over yours.
If you are a Fed, its the quality of people like you weorking for the public why this country is such a mess.
Yoiu are a low life.
Why would you think that?There are 3 types of substances:
1. Banned
2. Approved for use
3. Neither banned nor approved, new product to be reviewed.
Those products falling into categories 1 & 3 cannot be used.
I believe Dank fooled Essendon that the product was in category 2 because it wasnt in 1. It was his interpretation & twisting of WADAs wording & Essendon should not have believed him. He's taken them down the garden path, just like he did to us!
Listen kunnjjjt, show me the legislation abotu "national secrets & how it applies to the Wada Code"You accuse me of knowing nothing, call me a childish name and then make a statement like that.
I don't even know where to start.
Your statement regarding the Essendon lawyer is just rediculas, a lawyer would never "Press" the Federal Police to do anything, that is just not how it works.
In this Country there is no such thing as a minimum sentence.
You can take who evers opinion you like, any "QC" making statements to the media clearly has an agenda anda client. He is paid to make his opinion.