Walt Flanigan
Referee
- Messages
- 20,727
Regardless of the outcome this will blow over in a couple of weeks like these alleged incidents always do.
I don't condone it but it always happens.
I don't condone it but it always happens.
to be fair, all bar nun isn't a nightclub. its a suburban pub. And while it does degenerate into a bit of a sleaze-fest on friday and saturday night but its very tame compared to other pubs and clubs in canberra.Jeez, there are sure to be a stack of strong witnesses to be found in a nightclub bathroom at 3 am in the morning. I am sure the cops will be vigorously pursuing this one :sarcasm:
Calling a woman (who obviously gave him her number) when he was drunk is a tad different to pissing on another person. Keep trying.
Sacked for what? Nothings been proven at all....idiot.
He called one of Minichello's friend's off Mini's phone.
I don't think they had actually met if I recall correctly.
How does it make a difference if the person who he's allegedy urinated on is a woman or a man? :?as silly as this sentence sounds - no way in hell should be sack carney for urinating on a member of the public. if we were going to do it, we should have done last year. is this behaviour weird and stupid - yes - but its not an act of physical violence. the only way this would be a sack-able offence if he did it to a woman.
the only way this would be a sack-able offence if he did it to a woman.
How does it make a difference if the person who he's allegedy urinated on is a woman or a man? :?
Is pissing on a woman worse than pissing on a man? Isn't it the act of pissing on a person (drunkenly, recklessly, bringing the club into disrepute and more than likely breaching a behavioural contract) here that matters?
No. There are categories that result in differing punishments depending on the type of person "urinated on".
Man > Female > Child > Handicapped people > Sharks fans
Its pretty obvious that urinating on a woman would automatically constitute a sexual assult charge.How does it make a difference if the person who he's allegedy urinated on is a woman or a man? :?
Is pissing on a woman worse than pissing on a man? Isn't it the act of pissing on a person (drunkenly, recklessly, bringing the club into disrepute and more than likely breaching a behavioural contract) here that matters?
little bit of urine never hurt anyone.
Its pretty obvious that urinating on a woman would automatically constitute a sexual assult charge.
And yes pissing on an unconsenting woman is worse than pissing on a man because the pandora's box of legal recourse open to a woman. That is unless ofcourse the man is gay - then its a hate crime.
dead straight. And a great way to fire up a dinner party.
That and fondue.
Whos the other player that got sacked when Carney was given another chance.
Raiders did say he's on his last chance.
If allegations are true, then he should be sacked. Otherwise they're soft c**ks.
I'm still confused.
You're being too too metaphorical. If you can explain statements I've made in regards to the comments you've made, and do so in quotes i've made, then i'll happily respond.
I'm still not sure what you're trying to say.. I dont mean to be offensive but you're writing posts like you're writing a university essay without explaining your point. Are you actually trying to prove a point or just sound smart for the sake of it?
Raiders said he was on his last chance after he got caught doing burnouts while drunk in Goulburn (which was a while before the time he got into a cop chase and bailed)