Does it really matter what their catchment is?, they are Sydney clubs and should be appealing to people all over sydney, not just in their catchment zone. The Sydney clubs that can play out of centralized stadiums will be the ones the NRL won't want to move I would think.
Im also saying the 3 teams moved elsewhere (being Dragons, Roosters, Bunnies) that would not lose a geographical footprint to other codes
Wests are fairly large, aswell as Penrith, Canterbury and Parramatta are spread out mid range, and even though manly aren't actually representing that whole north shore, they one day can, aswell as cronulla taking on more above them.
This should be our footprint, by moving on the 3 clubs i mentioned before.
Wollongong dragons, South Brisbane Rabbitohs, Adelaide Roosters. This will benefit sydney in the long run, and open new markets, keep the 16 clubs, and expand with Perth, redcliffe, CC, NZ2.
Down the line.
The catchments are important for fan relevance, you want more crowds at campbelltown stadium, then you gotta be based there, take your bigger games to WSS, but dont train at concord, and play 3 games a year at campbelltown, and pretend you represent.
Be present in you catchment, the big stadiums won't prop up clubs in the future, rabbits and dogs share ANZ, fans hate t he venue, also looks terrible on tv being so empty, howz that going work for the future?
We cannot move souths, but leave easts in sydney or vice versa, gotta move them both,
They wouldn't team up if they were pushed by the NRL, best places to thrive seperately are brisbane where they want a 2nd team, and if we start fresh with a new franchise, it may tank like the titans, souths are well supported around Australia, and could very well survive abroad. Same with roosters, Adelaide needs to get Owned by NRL, Adelaide don't need NRL, we need that market/state more than they want us, and you cant send your worst club to take it, you gotta sent your best.
And the best is the roosters